<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geometric Network Snapping -- Separate Tolerance for Separate Region in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401702#M23016</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Craig -&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I appreciate the feedback.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not sure I fully follow your suggestion, though.&amp;nbsp; If I move one region of the network to a different database instance or into a different dataset within the same instance (with new class names of course) then I could just use the normal process for creating a network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you suggesting possibly taking the sparse region, moving it to a separate instance.&amp;nbsp; Building a network with a course-grained snapping tolerance.&amp;nbsp; Then drop the network and move it back into the full database and create a new network with a fine-grained tolerance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-13T22:36:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geometric Network Snapping -- Separate Tolerance for Separate Region</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401700#M23014</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here's a question.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've got a Geodatabase on which I want to build a geometric network.&amp;nbsp; But I don't want to apply the same snapping tolerance to the full database.&amp;nbsp; There are dense regions and there are sparse regions and I'd like to apply a relatively small tolerance in the dense and a relatively large tolerance in the sparse.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;One thought I had is to find a way to apply geometric network snapping, by region, outside the process of actually creating the network.&amp;nbsp; In this way I'd apply a small snap tolerance to the dense and a larger tolerance to the sparse.&amp;nbsp; Then create the network with the smaller tolerance (or no tolerance at all) knowing that sparse area features have already been snapped.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If I did this I'd need to find the interface that performs geometric network snapping and see if that can be separated from the network creation process.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anyone done this?&amp;nbsp; Any comments would be much appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 14:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401700#M23014</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-07T14:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geometric Network Snapping -- Separate Tolerance for Separate Region</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401701#M23015</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ed,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Geometric network snapping cannot be applied by region.&amp;nbsp; If you are using ArcGIS 10.0 or later; it does use the same code as the Topology Validate process.&amp;nbsp; One way to solve this issue is to have you data stored in separate geodatabases or feature datasets based on regions and then create a Topology on each applying the cluster tolerance for that specific region.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Craig&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:41:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401701#M23015</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigGillgrass</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-12T14:41:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geometric Network Snapping -- Separate Tolerance for Separate Region</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401702#M23016</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Craig -&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I appreciate the feedback.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not sure I fully follow your suggestion, though.&amp;nbsp; If I move one region of the network to a different database instance or into a different dataset within the same instance (with new class names of course) then I could just use the normal process for creating a network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are you suggesting possibly taking the sparse region, moving it to a separate instance.&amp;nbsp; Building a network with a course-grained snapping tolerance.&amp;nbsp; Then drop the network and move it back into the full database and create a new network with a fine-grained tolerance?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 22:36:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401702#M23016</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardBlair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-13T22:36:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geometric Network Snapping -- Separate Tolerance for Separate Region</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401703#M23017</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you suggesting possibly taking the sparse region, moving it to a separate instance.&amp;nbsp; Building a network with a course-grained snapping tolerance.&amp;nbsp; Then drop the network and move it back into the full database and create a new network with a fine-grained tolerance?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes. That's how other sites have handled this type of situation.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:00:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/geometric-network-snapping-separate-tolerance-for/m-p/401703#M23017</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigGillgrass</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-15T12:00:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

