<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Editor tracking vs attribute assistant methods in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/editor-tracking-vs-attribute-assistant-methods/m-p/40677#M2250</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is the response I received from ESRI tech support:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"Either method would be appropriate, however, tracking using editor tracking may be a better alternative than using the Attribute Add-In.&amp;nbsp; The attribute add-in works at the client level which can be disabled when upgrading the software or if the client machine forgets to turn it on.&amp;nbsp; In some scenarios, it may be better to turn on editor tracking since it works at the database level tracking edits.&amp;nbsp; This means that when upgrading the software or when changing machines, you may not lose this functionality.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-06T19:03:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Editor tracking vs attribute assistant methods</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/editor-tracking-vs-attribute-assistant-methods/m-p/40676#M2249</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am exploring ways to automate the recording of the user name and date when a record is edited. It seems that editor tracking and&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the methods "current username" and "timestamp" in the Attribute Assistant Add-in offer two paths to doing the same thing. Is one favored over the other? Are these methods meant to be complementary?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/editor-tracking-vs-attribute-assistant-methods/m-p/40676#M2249</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-03T14:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Editor tracking vs attribute assistant methods</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/editor-tracking-vs-attribute-assistant-methods/m-p/40677#M2250</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is the response I received from ESRI tech support:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"Either method would be appropriate, however, tracking using editor tracking may be a better alternative than using the Attribute Add-In.&amp;nbsp; The attribute add-in works at the client level which can be disabled when upgrading the software or if the client machine forgets to turn it on.&amp;nbsp; In some scenarios, it may be better to turn on editor tracking since it works at the database level tracking edits.&amp;nbsp; This means that when upgrading the software or when changing machines, you may not lose this functionality.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 19:03:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/editor-tracking-vs-attribute-assistant-methods/m-p/40677#M2250</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-06T19:03:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

