<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Performance Metrics ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366857#M20918</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok, given that "A relational database will never outperform a flat file in a single-user "access all rows" test.", where are the performance metrics for ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase for multiple-user with limited number of rows access?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The only numbers I have been able to find were from this whitepaper: &amp;gt; ArcGIS Server in Practice Series: High Capacity Map Services: A Use-Case with CORINE Land Cover Data&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1549"&gt;http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1549&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and in this Whitepaper the File Geodatabase was able to generate almost twice as many maps&amp;nbsp; per hour and had a better response time (page 20 figure 7).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In the following whitepaper, they seemed to use both types but did not compare them (unless I missed it somehow): ArcGIS Server in Practice Series: ArcGIS Server Web Mapping Application for Municipal/Local Govt.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1540"&gt;http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1540&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So does anyone else have performance metrics?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 04:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NeoGeo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-29T04:58:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Metrics ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366857#M20918</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ok, given that "A relational database will never outperform a flat file in a single-user "access all rows" test.", where are the performance metrics for ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase for multiple-user with limited number of rows access?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The only numbers I have been able to find were from this whitepaper: &amp;gt; ArcGIS Server in Practice Series: High Capacity Map Services: A Use-Case with CORINE Land Cover Data&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1549"&gt;http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1549&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and in this Whitepaper the File Geodatabase was able to generate almost twice as many maps&amp;nbsp; per hour and had a better response time (page 20 figure 7).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In the following whitepaper, they seemed to use both types but did not compare them (unless I missed it somehow): ArcGIS Server in Practice Series: ArcGIS Server Web Mapping Application for Municipal/Local Govt.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1540"&gt;http://support.esri.com/index.cfm?fa=knowledgebase.whitepapers.viewPaper&amp;amp;PID=66&amp;amp;MetaID=1540&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So does anyone else have performance metrics?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 04:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366857#M20918</guid>
      <dc:creator>NeoGeo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-29T04:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Metrics ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366858#M20919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Update.... I see that the Corinne study was not a fair comparison as the File Geodatabase was stored locally not in a shared folder, which almost certainly would have incurred a performance hit.&amp;nbsp; On our network which is a latency disaster, the performance difference would probably be huge, so I suppose if you have massive quantities of storage directly on your ArcGIS server, then there might be an advantage to using a local file geodatabase.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:54:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366858#M20919</guid>
      <dc:creator>NeoGeo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-29T16:54:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Metrics ArcSDE vs File Geodatabase</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366859#M20920</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi J oN,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt; So does anyone else have performance metrics? &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/content/enterprisegis/10.0/performance_benchmarks"&gt;Esri Performance Benchmarks&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; page, on the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/content/enterprisegis/10.0/about"&gt;Enterprise GIS Resource Center&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; might have something. Check out the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/gallery/file/enterprise-gis"&gt;Implementation Gallery&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; for some additional case studies - they may contain additional comparisons.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:40:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/performance-metrics-arcsde-vs-file-geodatabase/m-p/366859#M20920</guid>
      <dc:creator>DerekLaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-31T04:40:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

