<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: best large imagery file format to use? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346130#M19751</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The most likely candidate that I can think of is jpeg 2000 (JP2 commonly).&amp;nbsp; MrSid, ECW and JP2 all use wavelet compression which works well with photography and greatly reduces disk storage requirements.&amp;nbsp; Decompressing does use CPU cycles, but for many purposes only the area being displayed needs to be uncompressed, and they have built in pyramids.&amp;nbsp; ArcMap handles them all.&amp;nbsp; MrSid and ECW, however, are proprietary and require expensive encoders.&amp;nbsp; Jpeg2000 is open source and ESRI's own software can encode it.&amp;nbsp; I warn you that at least through 9.3.1, the ESRI encoding produced a JP2 file that was rather slow to display on a computer, and awful on ArcPad.&amp;nbsp; The best JP2s I've seen comes from the expensive LizardTech encoder that also does MrSid.&amp;nbsp; JP2's also supports 4 bands.&amp;nbsp; I haven't found a good free JP2 encoder.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you weren't using photos, but rasters such as the USGS topos (DRGs), then I'd suggest using tif rasters with LZW compression.&amp;nbsp; The compression is very high and the tifs very fast.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohnSobetzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-06T19:33:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>best large imagery file format to use?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346129#M19750</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi folks -&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've been tasked - as a contractor to a contractor -with the task of making some Rather Large Imagery mosaics.&amp;nbsp; I have not been given any specs other than 'make it suitable for use by college students learning GIS (I am assuming using ESRI products).&amp;nbsp; The files are on the order of 3.7 GB in img format.&amp;nbsp; My question is, what is the 'best' format to use to store these files in terms of flexibility - given I have not been told what to use.&amp;nbsp; Would it be a GEoTiff or is there something equally user friendly, free to write and read, that offers better compression?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cyndy&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346129#M19750</guid>
      <dc:creator>CyndyBresloff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-06T19:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: best large imagery file format to use?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346130#M19751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The most likely candidate that I can think of is jpeg 2000 (JP2 commonly).&amp;nbsp; MrSid, ECW and JP2 all use wavelet compression which works well with photography and greatly reduces disk storage requirements.&amp;nbsp; Decompressing does use CPU cycles, but for many purposes only the area being displayed needs to be uncompressed, and they have built in pyramids.&amp;nbsp; ArcMap handles them all.&amp;nbsp; MrSid and ECW, however, are proprietary and require expensive encoders.&amp;nbsp; Jpeg2000 is open source and ESRI's own software can encode it.&amp;nbsp; I warn you that at least through 9.3.1, the ESRI encoding produced a JP2 file that was rather slow to display on a computer, and awful on ArcPad.&amp;nbsp; The best JP2s I've seen comes from the expensive LizardTech encoder that also does MrSid.&amp;nbsp; JP2's also supports 4 bands.&amp;nbsp; I haven't found a good free JP2 encoder.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you weren't using photos, but rasters such as the USGS topos (DRGs), then I'd suggest using tif rasters with LZW compression.&amp;nbsp; The compression is very high and the tifs very fast.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346130#M19751</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnSobetzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-06T19:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: best large imagery file format to use?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346131#M19752</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I also think wavelet compression formats are best for very large images. But JPEG2000 has an horrific performance, and others are expensive. You can get a free ECW encoder for images up to 500MB (lookup ERDAS' site).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You should consider creating Tiled GTIFF files with JPEG compression. From my experience, this format is very performant and compatible with a wide array of GIS software. You additionally need to create the pyramids. For more details look here:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.gdal.org/frmt_gtiff.html"&gt;http://www.gdal.org/frmt_gtiff.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.mail-archive.com/mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org/msg01155.html"&gt;http://www.mail-archive.com/mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org/msg01155.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best of luck.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Duarte&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/346131#M19752</guid>
      <dc:creator>DuarteCarreira</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-17T17:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: best large imagery file format to use?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/1691328#M45855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;MrSID vs JPEG2000: Why GIS Professionals Prefer MrSID. Real Compression Test Results That Set the Record Straight&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original GeoTiff: 1.06 GB&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;100:1 Compressed JPEG2000: 5.6 MB&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;100:1 Compressed MrSID: 1.6 MB&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Combined.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/150000i40A368BAC4CB76BF/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Combined.png" alt="Combined.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/best-large-imagery-file-format-to-use/m-p/1691328#M45855</guid>
      <dc:creator>EshaanSharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-18T17:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

