<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic FRAGSTATS - Contagion problems in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/fragstats-contagion-problems/m-p/345217#M19663</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For a reason I can't figure out, the results from running the landscape metric contagion is giving me the exact opposite results that I should be getting.&amp;nbsp; For instance, the middle of the forest has a value of 0. That is definitely not right!&amp;nbsp; I've been running a moving window analysis on my study area, which I have as signed integer, GRID formatted, with a cell size of 10x10 and a moving window of 150m in diameter.&amp;nbsp; I valued all the no data/background cells as -1.&amp;nbsp; I can't figure out why contagion is coming up so off!&amp;nbsp; I feel like it has to have something to do with the formatting of the raster file.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AshleyUnger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-06-18T20:21:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FRAGSTATS - Contagion problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/fragstats-contagion-problems/m-p/345217#M19663</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For a reason I can't figure out, the results from running the landscape metric contagion is giving me the exact opposite results that I should be getting.&amp;nbsp; For instance, the middle of the forest has a value of 0. That is definitely not right!&amp;nbsp; I've been running a moving window analysis on my study area, which I have as signed integer, GRID formatted, with a cell size of 10x10 and a moving window of 150m in diameter.&amp;nbsp; I valued all the no data/background cells as -1.&amp;nbsp; I can't figure out why contagion is coming up so off!&amp;nbsp; I feel like it has to have something to do with the formatting of the raster file.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/fragstats-contagion-problems/m-p/345217#M19663</guid>
      <dc:creator>AshleyUnger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-18T20:21:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FRAGSTATS - Contagion problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/fragstats-contagion-problems/m-p/345218#M19664</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I know this is a lost thread, but I'm having the same problem. Were you able to solve it?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 15:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/fragstats-contagion-problems/m-p/345218#M19664</guid>
      <dc:creator>RodrigoVillegas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-01T15:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

