<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mosaicked DEM has half the range of values of the originals in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaicked-dem-has-half-the-range-of-values-of-the/m-p/341738#M19468</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have two DEMs that I would like to stitch together for least-cost path analysis. One DEM ranges from 100-399; the other ranges from 182-474.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've tried several approaches. I created a mosaic dataset and added the rasters to it, which results in a big grey rectangle. I had the most luck with the Mosaic to New Raster tool, but the resulting raster has values from 93 to 255--about half the range of the original rasters, and not nearly enough contrast for what I need. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong--I just want a raster that has the same elevation data as the original two rasters, but in one dataset! Any ideas?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ErinWarford</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-28T02:47:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mosaicked DEM has half the range of values of the originals</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaicked-dem-has-half-the-range-of-values-of-the/m-p/341738#M19468</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have two DEMs that I would like to stitch together for least-cost path analysis. One DEM ranges from 100-399; the other ranges from 182-474.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've tried several approaches. I created a mosaic dataset and added the rasters to it, which results in a big grey rectangle. I had the most luck with the Mosaic to New Raster tool, but the resulting raster has values from 93 to 255--about half the range of the original rasters, and not nearly enough contrast for what I need. I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong--I just want a raster that has the same elevation data as the original two rasters, but in one dataset! Any ideas?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaicked-dem-has-half-the-range-of-values-of-the/m-p/341738#M19468</guid>
      <dc:creator>ErinWarford</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-28T02:47:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mosaicked DEM has half the range of values of the originals</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaicked-dem-has-half-the-range-of-values-of-the/m-p/341739#M19469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Use the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//001700000098000000"&gt;Mosaic To New Raster (Data Management) &lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; aand set the pixel type of your&amp;nbsp; output raster to 16_BIT_UNSIGNED.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 05:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/mosaicked-dem-has-half-the-range-of-values-of-the/m-p/341739#M19469</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luke_Pinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-28T05:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

