Nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution re-sampling produce the same result

DavidBirkigt — Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:03:01 GMT

Hi,

I am re-sampling an aerial image with red green and blue bands (.ecw) with arc 9.3. I understand the differences between re-sampling techniques and was surprised when nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution produced the same result after re-sampling from .1m to .5m. Attached is a .pdf of a car in the original and resulting image as well as an associated pixel value.

Can anyone shed some light as to why the result was the same?

Thanks

Re: Nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution re-sampling produce the same res

ErinLatham — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:28:59 GMT

It may be a tricky display thing. I recommend trying to take a difference image with raster calculator between the interpolation methods to see the values change. Sometimes the images do not appear to change due to the raster display options, or even slow caching of the program.

Hope this helps.
Good luck.

topic Nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution re-sampling produce the same result in Data Management Questions

Nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution re-sampling produce the same result

Re: Nearest neighbor, bilinear and cubic convolution re-sampling produce the same res