<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Match rate difference between Texas A&amp;amp;M Geoservices aka TAMU and ArcGIS in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/match-rate-difference-between-texas-a-amp-m/m-p/333813#M18985</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min- padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My geocoding match rate using TAMU is 100% versus 97% with ArcGis using same database. Any idea what cause this differential matching rates? What leads ArcGis to a lower matching rate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BayarmagnaiMunkhjargal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-25T00:01:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Match rate difference between Texas A&amp;M Geoservices aka TAMU and ArcGIS</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/match-rate-difference-between-texas-a-amp-m/m-p/333813#M18985</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min- padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My geocoding match rate using TAMU is 100% versus 97% with ArcGis using same database. Any idea what cause this differential matching rates? What leads ArcGis to a lower matching rate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/match-rate-difference-between-texas-a-amp-m/m-p/333813#M18985</guid>
      <dc:creator>BayarmagnaiMunkhjargal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T00:01:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

