<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How large do archive feature classes become? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324660#M18559</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I generally don't start to worry about tables until they have more than 20-25 million rows in them.&amp;nbsp; 150K is only barely large enough to manifest signs of spatial fragmentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GIS &amp;gt; Managing Data seems like a good fit for data management Qs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-22T20:06:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324657#M18556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone help me understand how large an archive feature class could become over time?&amp;nbsp; We've been exploring collector and archiving feature classes and some are very large even prior to archiving.&amp;nbsp; Before I get a nasty-gram from our DBA's I thought I would do some research.&amp;nbsp; I would also appreciate any workflows related to archiving data and versioning.&amp;nbsp; Our production environment is a versioned SDE but our collector data will be living in another SDE instance that isn't versioned.&amp;nbsp; If my question needs clarification please let me know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brandon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:38:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324657#M18556</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrandonKeinath1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-21T00:38:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324658#M18557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many features are you adding?&amp;nbsp; Archiving storage is purely based on data volume.&amp;nbsp; If you're really headed into "very large" space, then using partitioning to lop off "oldest" data might need to be part of your maintenance design.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS: If you post questions "In a Place" rather in you own discussion, then you'll get a broader set of viewers.&amp;nbsp; You can move questions using the Move choice to the right of the discussion page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:17:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324658#M18557</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T19:17:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324659#M18558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Vince,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; Some of the feature classes we would be interested in archiving have in excess of 150,000 records currently.&amp;nbsp; Is the archive feature class something that our DBA's or &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/22655"&gt;J L&lt;/A&gt; would be able to view in the database and monitor the size while we test?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have a place suggestion for the discussion?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brandon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 19:56:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324659#M18558</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrandonKeinath1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T19:56:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324660#M18559</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I generally don't start to worry about tables until they have more than 20-25 million rows in them.&amp;nbsp; 150K is only barely large enough to manifest signs of spatial fragmentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;GIS &amp;gt; Managing Data seems like a good fit for data management Qs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324660#M18559</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T20:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324661#M18560</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Funny.&amp;nbsp; I'll focus on other more pressing fears then.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Brandon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324661#M18560</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrandonKeinath1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-22T20:11:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324662#M18561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Vince,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is your favorite way to monitor the table sizes? Is there a way that &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/56185"&gt;Brandon Keinath&lt;/A&gt;‌ and I could keep an eye on that without having oracle sys access?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:55:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324662#M18561</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshLehn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-11T21:55:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How large do archive feature classes become?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324663#M18562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That really depends on the definition of "table size", but none of the queries require more than nominal owner permissions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the row count of a single non-versioned, unarchived table, the SQL would be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;SELECT count(*) as NumRows 
FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tablename
/&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the segment storage of a specific table, the SQL would be:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;SELECT&amp;nbsp; bytes/1024/1024 as Mb 
FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; user_segments 
WHERE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; segment_name = 'TABLENAME'
/&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The process becomes trickier when you want to include the spatial index organized table (IOT), or a feature class has geometries outside the inline storage clause size, is versioned, or is archived (or some combination thereof).&amp;nbsp; The naming for these objects is straightforward (well, except for the LOB storage naming; that's always been a black box to me), but there's lots of them,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you place the tables you worry about in their own tablespace, you can cut to the chase with something like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE class="lia-code-sample line-numbers language-none"&gt;SELECT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; sum(bytes)/1024/1024 as Mb,
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tablespace_name
FROM&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; user_segments
WHERE&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tablespace_name like '%_TBLSP'
GROUP BY tablespace_name
/ &lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- V&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/how-large-do-archive-feature-classes-become/m-p/324663#M18562</guid>
      <dc:creator>VinceAngelo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-11T15:23:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

