<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Possible to avoid creating feature class from locator in GP? Or must use other API? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/possible-to-avoid-creating-feature-class-from/m-p/307569#M17566</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are hoping to avoid putting 150 million records into a GDB just to get the XY, refID, and % along. Is there a way to avoid creating the feature class in GP, or do we need to go to another API to avoid that? ArcObjects IBatchGeocoding?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HarryBowman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T19:47:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Possible to avoid creating feature class from locator in GP? Or must use other API?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/possible-to-avoid-creating-feature-class-from/m-p/307569#M17566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are hoping to avoid putting 150 million records into a GDB just to get the XY, refID, and % along. Is there a way to avoid creating the feature class in GP, or do we need to go to another API to avoid that? ArcObjects IBatchGeocoding?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 19:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/possible-to-avoid-creating-feature-class-from/m-p/307569#M17566</guid>
      <dc:creator>HarryBowman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-23T19:47:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

