<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SYNC versions didn't delete after unregistering replica (revived from the old forum) in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sync-versions-didn-t-delete-after-unregistering/m-p/305737#M17462</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have a client who is experiencing the "orphaned sync versions" mentioned in this article from the old forum:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.esri.com/thread.asp?t=229883&amp;amp;f=2284&amp;amp;c=158&amp;amp;ESRISessionID=eDLV2sxwfg6nhGiBLXjRHuNO_R5ANdVYommdXtZWtxiy1lPNdt8Ol46BJVx4DvpUUDLNnak="&gt;http://forums.esri.com/thread.asp?t=229883&amp;amp;f=2284&amp;amp;c=158&amp;amp;ESRISessionID=eDLV2sxwfg6nhGiBLXjRHuNO_R5ANdVYommdXtZWtxiy1lPNdt8Ol46BJVx4DvpUUDLNnak=&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is their environment:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;oracle 10.2.0.3 on linux &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;arcsde 9.2 sp6&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;details:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;18 registered replicas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;86 versions with names like 'SYNC%';&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I believe 45 of these versions are orphaned per a query i put together.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure it could be made cleaner using regular expressions, but I've written the ugly way in case anyone out there is still using oracle 9i.&amp;nbsp; Please let me know your thoughts on whether safe to use as a delete reference or if can be improved.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;select owner,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;name,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,2)+1,instr(name,'_',1,3)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1) replica_id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from sde.versions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;where name&amp;nbsp; like 'SYNC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and name not like 'SYNC_RECEIVE_REC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,2)+1,instr(name,'_',1,3)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not in (select to_char(id) from sde.gdb_replicas)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;union&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;select owner,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;name,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,3)+1,instr(name,'_',1,4)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1) replica_id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from sde.versions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;where name like 'SYNC_RECEIVE_REC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,3)+1,instr(name,'_',1,4)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not in (select to_char(id) from sde.gdb_replicas);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anthony&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>anthonysanchez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-30T20:42:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SYNC versions didn't delete after unregistering replica (revived from the old forum)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sync-versions-didn-t-delete-after-unregistering/m-p/305737#M17462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello all,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have a client who is experiencing the "orphaned sync versions" mentioned in this article from the old forum:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.esri.com/thread.asp?t=229883&amp;amp;f=2284&amp;amp;c=158&amp;amp;ESRISessionID=eDLV2sxwfg6nhGiBLXjRHuNO_R5ANdVYommdXtZWtxiy1lPNdt8Ol46BJVx4DvpUUDLNnak="&gt;http://forums.esri.com/thread.asp?t=229883&amp;amp;f=2284&amp;amp;c=158&amp;amp;ESRISessionID=eDLV2sxwfg6nhGiBLXjRHuNO_R5ANdVYommdXtZWtxiy1lPNdt8Ol46BJVx4DvpUUDLNnak=&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Here is their environment:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;oracle 10.2.0.3 on linux &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;arcsde 9.2 sp6&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;details:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;18 registered replicas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;86 versions with names like 'SYNC%';&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I believe 45 of these versions are orphaned per a query i put together.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure it could be made cleaner using regular expressions, but I've written the ugly way in case anyone out there is still using oracle 9i.&amp;nbsp; Please let me know your thoughts on whether safe to use as a delete reference or if can be improved.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;select owner,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;name,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,2)+1,instr(name,'_',1,3)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1) replica_id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from sde.versions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;where name&amp;nbsp; like 'SYNC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and name not like 'SYNC_RECEIVE_REC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,2)+1,instr(name,'_',1,3)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not in (select to_char(id) from sde.gdb_replicas)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;union&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;select owner,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;name,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,3)+1,instr(name,'_',1,4)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1) replica_id&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from sde.versions&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;where name like 'SYNC_RECEIVE_REC%'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and substr(name,instr(name,'_',1,3)+1,instr(name,'_',1,4)-instr(name,'_',1,2)-1)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;not in (select to_char(id) from sde.gdb_replicas);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anthony&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:42:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/sync-versions-didn-t-delete-after-unregistering/m-p/305737#M17462</guid>
      <dc:creator>anthonysanchez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-30T20:42:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

