<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcSDE Size/Performance with Thousands of Attachments in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286756#M16472</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently testing Attachments with some layers.&amp;nbsp; My only worry is that if I add tens of thousands of images and documents to the database it would lose performance or be too large to run adequately.&amp;nbsp; I'm just trying to get a general idea based on other user's experiences with document management.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Will&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WilliamPlatt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-17T17:31:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Size/Performance with Thousands of Attachments</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286754#M16470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello, I have been trying to find some information regarding size and performance issues in regards to attachments to features in ArcSDE.&amp;nbsp; I am currently using 10.2.&amp;nbsp; Here is an example of what I would like to do.&amp;nbsp; I have a layer of 10,000+ points.&amp;nbsp; I have three or more images and pdfs that need to be associated with each of the points.&amp;nbsp; How would the ArcSDE geodatabase handle all of these attachments?&amp;nbsp; I have tried hyperlinking the images and pdfs using the "Add Hyperlink..." option in the Identify tool, but the hyperlinks are not saved to the layer/feature.&amp;nbsp; I could use fields for hyperlinks in the layers but I would have to have at least five (and sometimes many more) hyperlink fields in each layer.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The end result I want is to have the end-user be able to click on feature and in some way have access to all of the documents associated with that feature be available (pdfs and images).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Will&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 13:44:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286754#M16470</guid>
      <dc:creator>WilliamPlatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-17T13:44:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE Size/Performance with Thousands of Attachments</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286755#M16471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Will,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2; font-family: arial;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you enable attachments in your geodatabase it creates a relationship class and table that is linked to the source feature class. I would review the following link to see which workflow would be best for you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As for the performance, that is very difficult to estimate as the size of the attachments, RDBMS used, machine specs, etc.... all factor into the performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2; font-family: arial;"&gt;An overview of the Attachments toolset: &lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/An_overview_of_the_Attachments_toolset/00170000015m000000/"&gt;http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/An_overview_of_the_Attachments_toolset/00170000015m000000/&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2; font-family: arial;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Working with the Attachments geoprocessing tools: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 2; font-family: arial;"&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Working_with_the_Attachments_geoprocessing_tools/00170000017z000000/"&gt;http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#/Working_with_the_Attachments_geoprocessing_tools/00170000017z000000/ &lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:09:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286755#M16471</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-17T17:09:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE Size/Performance with Thousands of Attachments</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286756#M16472</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently testing Attachments with some layers.&amp;nbsp; My only worry is that if I add tens of thousands of images and documents to the database it would lose performance or be too large to run adequately.&amp;nbsp; I'm just trying to get a general idea based on other user's experiences with document management.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Will&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286756#M16472</guid>
      <dc:creator>WilliamPlatt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-17T17:31:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcSDE Size/Performance with Thousands of Attachments</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286757#M16473</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello William,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was curious if you had come to any conclusions regarding GIS performance and attachments.&amp;nbsp; We are about to begin a similar project, attaching numerous (thousands of pictures and video files) to one of our feature classes, and I was wondering if you had noticed any performance issues with that many features attached.&amp;nbsp; I've searched high and low for some type of magic number, either number of attachments or overall file size, where performance begins to be negatively affected.&amp;nbsp; Any insight you may have would be most helpful!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff Miller&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-size-performance-with-thousands-of/m-p/286757#M16473</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffMiller7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-13T18:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

