<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcSDE Install 2 in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279819#M16077</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4.&amp;nbsp; This is a 64 bit implementation.&amp;nbsp; Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Robert&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Very aggressive scheduling, Robert.&amp;nbsp; Good to know.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the prompt response. PG on Linux 64, what about on windows 64?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-02T00:13:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279813#M16071</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The list is growing, when will there be a PG 64 bit?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:19:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279813#M16071</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:19:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Initial Data File Size</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279814#M16072</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Initial Data File Size used to be 40 MB, and now it is showing 100 MB, is this the expected behavior?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:24:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279814#M16072</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:24:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279815#M16073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Installs on top of the Nov CTP for SQL 08 R2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279815#M16073</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-25T20:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279816#M16074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;The Initial Data File Size used to be 40 MB, and now it is showing 100 MB, is this the expected behavior?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can you provide some more information about exactly what you are seeing?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:35:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279816#M16074</guid>
      <dc:creator>RussellBrennan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T22:35:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279817#M16075</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4.&amp;nbsp; This is a 64 bit implementation.&amp;nbsp; Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Robert&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279817#M16075</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertWest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T23:15:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279818#M16076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Can you provide some more information about exactly what you are seeing?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;These are just the default values that are inserted in the data files, and log files entry for installing.&amp;nbsp; 100 MB actually makes a bit more sense, I am just noting that there is a change.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279818#M16076</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-02T00:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279819#M16077</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4.&amp;nbsp; This is a 64 bit implementation.&amp;nbsp; Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Robert&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Very aggressive scheduling, Robert.&amp;nbsp; Good to know.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the prompt response. PG on Linux 64, what about on windows 64?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279819#M16077</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-02T00:13:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279820#M16078</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have no plans to build a native 64 bit implementation of ArcSDE for PosgreSQL on Windows.&amp;nbsp; Here's a link explaining why.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_&amp;amp;_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows#Is_there_a_64-bit_build_of_PostgreSQL_for_Windows.3F"&gt;http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_&amp;amp;_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows#Is_there_a_64-bit_build_of_PostgreSQL_for_Windows.3F&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If this situation changes, we'll adapt as quickly as we can.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Robert&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:12:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279820#M16078</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertWest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T14:12:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279821#M16079</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;PostgreSQL uses a multi-process architecture, not multi-threaded. In a multi-threaded database server, all client connections share the memory space, and are again limited by the total addressable memory region. With PostgreSQL, you could easily have more than 1Gb per backend (if necessary) without running out of memory, which significantly pushes away the point when you need to go to 64-bit.&lt;BR /&gt;Robert&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Robert, I am a bit ignorant&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:30:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279821#M16079</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T14:30:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279822#M16080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry, no, that was not the intent at all.&amp;nbsp; I just meant to let you know that there was no 64 bit version of PostgreSQL on Windows that we could use, thus we could not build a 64 bit Windows version of ArcSDE for PostgreSQL, that's all.&amp;nbsp; The other technical details provided in that thread may be interesting, but are really just extra info you probably didn't need.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Robert&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:34:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279822#M16080</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertWest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T14:34:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279823#M16081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Sorry, no, that was not the intent at all. I just meant to let you know that there was no 64 bit version of PostgreSQL on Windows that we could use, thus we could not build a 64 bit Windows version of ArcSDE for PostgreSQL, that's all. The other technical details provided in that thread may be interesting, but are really just extra info you probably didn't need.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Robert&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I know that was not your intent.&amp;nbsp; You are a nice person.&amp;nbsp; I am stating a fact, that yes, I am a little ignorant, for some things, and in this case, I never realized there was no 64 bit version.&amp;nbsp; I added the quote to say to myself that right there they state there is no win 64 version, thats all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279823#M16081</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-05T22:54:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279824#M16082</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;In January, we started building a version of ArcSDE 10 for PostgreSQL on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 update 4.&amp;nbsp; This is a 64 bit implementation.&amp;nbsp; Our goal is to fully test and certify this as ready to ship with pre-release in March. &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is not available in 9.4 Beta2? We have installed RHEL5 (64 bit) on AMD x86/x64, PostGreSQL 8.4 (64 bit) and ArcSDE 9.4 Beta2. When running sdesetup we get the following error:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Connection to database 'xxxxx' failed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Error creating ArcSDE direct connection (-9).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When will the Pre-release be available?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Per Niska&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Dynalab&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 07:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279824#M16082</guid>
      <dc:creator>PerNiska</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-30T07:12:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ArcSDE Install 2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279825#M16083</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pre-release should be available for download "almost any day" now.&amp;nbsp; We are trying to get all of pre-release up on the resource center for download this week.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; All beta sites should receive an email when it's available.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Robert&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:59:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/arcsde-install-2/m-p/279825#M16083</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertWest</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-30T14:59:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

