<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265246#M15336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Spatial Analyst resamples using Nearest. Automatic resampling is triggered when there are different cell sizes, changes in processing environment and/or projection changes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What you could try is to copy your raster from the mosaic dataset into a single raster dataset, use CopyRaster. You will then see what the cell size is and this is basically the raster that'll be contoured.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steve&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T14:44:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265242#M15332</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I created a file geodatabase mosaic dataset combining lidar-derived DEM TIFFs from a number of different surveys.&amp;nbsp; It combines multiple cell sizes and horizontal datums.&amp;nbsp; There is a lot to love about the mosaic dataset, I like it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But I'm having a problem with generating contours from the master mosaic.&amp;nbsp; In areas where the source data is the lower resolution (6ft pixels vs 3ft) the contours appear jagged, blocky, pixelized, however you want to say it.&amp;nbsp; What is really throwing me off, though, is if I generate the contours directly from the source mosaic that has 6ft pixels, the contours are much more acceptably smooth, as they should be.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm attaching an example, it is a transition area where there is overlap between 3ft and 6ft pixels.&amp;nbsp; The yellow contours come from the master mosaic and it's easy to see what I'm talking about.&amp;nbsp; The purple contours come from the 6ft pixel source mosaic.&amp;nbsp; I'd appreciate any help with this!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265242#M15332</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanKelso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T18:30:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265243#M15333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hmm, I wasn't sure whether to post this here, on the Spatial Analyst forum, or the desktop general forum.&amp;nbsp; Maybe this was the wrong place...&amp;nbsp; I can't be the only person who has encountered this before.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265243#M15333</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanKelso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-22T13:49:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265244#M15334</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Mosaic dataset consists of many rasters with different cell sizes. Spatial Analyst, by default, uses the largest cell size when more than 1 raster is used. For example, raster1 has a cell size of 10 and raster2 has a cell size of 20. When you use the Plus tool the output will have a cell size of 20.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is what is happening with Contour, all the rasters are resampled to have a cell size=largest.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steve&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:10:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265244#M15334</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-22T15:10:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265245#M15335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steve, thanks for the reply.&amp;nbsp; I &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style:italic;"&gt;think&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; I get what you're saying, but I'm not sure because I don't understand how that matters in the scenario I'm describing.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my case, I have 6-foot and 3-foot pixels.&amp;nbsp; If what you're saying applies, then the 3-foot pixels are getting resampled to 6-foot so they are the ones that should look jagged, or they all should look that way if all cells are being resampled.&amp;nbsp; But if you look at my picture, the contours on the north half look fine, that is the area represented by 3-foot pixels.&amp;nbsp; It's the ones generated from the original 6-foot pixels that look bad.&amp;nbsp; And when I generate these contours from the source mosaic with all 6-foot pixels (the purple lines in my example) they look fine, so it's not like this resolution is "too low" to look good at this scale.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Besides, I can take the 3-foot source mosaic, resample it to 6-foot using either Nearest or Bilinear, create contours from it and they look perfectly fine.&amp;nbsp; So unless Spatial Analyst uses some other resampling method that isn't as good, why should this even matter?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265245#M15335</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanKelso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T14:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265246#M15336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Spatial Analyst resamples using Nearest. Automatic resampling is triggered when there are different cell sizes, changes in processing environment and/or projection changes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What you could try is to copy your raster from the mosaic dataset into a single raster dataset, use CopyRaster. You will then see what the cell size is and this is basically the raster that'll be contoured.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steve&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265246#M15336</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T14:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265247#M15337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So it sounds like you're saying Spatial Analyst doesn't provide the user any way to control how it resamples data?&amp;nbsp; I may also be seeing this same issue in areas of the mosaic that are being projected on the fly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's a real bummer, because I thought one of the big advantages to using the mosaic dataset is that you could combine original source data even in different coordinate systems and resolutions, on the fly.&amp;nbsp; The assumption being, you could run geoprocessing tools on the dataset and get acceptable results.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anyways, I do appreciate your responses, Steve.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:28:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265247#M15337</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanKelso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T15:28:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265248#M15338</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;The Mosaic dataset consists of many rasters with different cell sizes. Spatial Analyst, by default, uses the largest cell size when more than 1 raster is used. For example, raster1 has a cell size of 10 and raster2 has a cell size of 20. When you use the Plus tool the output will have a cell size of 20.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Spatial Analyst uses the largest cell size when there is more than 1 input raster, however, Mosaic datasets default to the smallest cell size, so in your case it'll resample to 3ft.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Steve&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:12:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265248#M15338</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveLynch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T16:12:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Jagged contours from mosaic dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265249#M15339</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Steve.&amp;nbsp; It's not the answer I was hoping for but at least I understand what's happening now.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/jagged-contours-from-mosaic-dataset/m-p/265249#M15339</guid>
      <dc:creator>RyanKelso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T16:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

