<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Are there consequences for having many unused domains in an SDE workspace? in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245813#M13973</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you turn on the logging for the connection:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/35704" title="http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/35704"&gt;35704 - Diagnose ArcSDE connection and performance issues using SDEINTERCEPT&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you might get an idea of how much those domains affect the connection speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I agree with Blake.&amp;nbsp; Keep it clean.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I guy who just stepped into a position of overseeing a rather large legacy system, I spend an awful lot of time just figuring out if something in the system is still in use, be it in the database, mxds, services on the servers, etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you leave detritus laying around, it's just more stuff to trip over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaulDavidson1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-20T18:49:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Are there consequences for having many unused domains in an SDE workspace?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245811#M13971</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any consequences (geodatabase performance or other) to having domains "stack up" in a SQL Server-based SDE geodatabase? I noticed many unused domains in an SDE workspace when running a script that writes domain properties to a series of file geodatabase tables. The script is attached. A lot of them have the same base name followed by an underscore and then a number:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="121263" class="image-1 jive-image" height="359" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/121263_pastedImage_0.png" style="height: 359px; width: 770.173010380623px;" width="770" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this particular enterprise geodatabase, there are 913 domains but only 93 of them are actually applied. So, is this ok? Or is there a compelling reason to clean up the unused domains and try to prevent them stacking up like this in the future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Micah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/group/1680"&gt;Geodatabase&lt;/A&gt;​ &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/space/2053"&gt;Enterprise GIS&lt;/A&gt;​&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 19:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245811#M13971</guid>
      <dc:creator>MicahBabinski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-06T19:36:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are there consequences for having many unused domains in an SDE workspace?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245812#M13972</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure about performance, but my first reaction is to keep it clean and remove the unused domains. We have a similar issue (although not this severe) but we haven't yet decided how to proceed. I I know you can create something, but I thought I would share what I came up with to identify unused domains and delete them. I noticed when testing that by default it didn't look for domains in subtypes so I had to code some extra for that. Maybe it'll help you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/message/526142"&gt;Delete Unused Domains&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245812#M13972</guid>
      <dc:creator>BlakeTerhune</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-06T22:57:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Are there consequences for having many unused domains in an SDE workspace?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245813#M13973</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you turn on the logging for the connection:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/35704" title="http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/techarticles/detail/35704"&gt;35704 - Diagnose ArcSDE connection and performance issues using SDEINTERCEPT&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you might get an idea of how much those domains affect the connection speed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I agree with Blake.&amp;nbsp; Keep it clean.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I guy who just stepped into a position of overseeing a rather large legacy system, I spend an awful lot of time just figuring out if something in the system is still in use, be it in the database, mxds, services on the servers, etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you leave detritus laying around, it's just more stuff to trip over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/are-there-consequences-for-having-many-unused/m-p/245813#M13973</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulDavidson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T18:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

