<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Subtype or New featureclass for better performance in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237926#M13494</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a scenario that New data has to be uploaded in the database and presented in multiple applications - desktop, web and mobile.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is there are 2 options to upload this data &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. As a subtype to existing featureclass and present as part of the existing layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. As a new featureclass and present as a new feature layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which of the above options is better with respect to performance (map loading, navigation, spatial querying)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sresree&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:08:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SreejaS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-29T13:08:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237926#M13494</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a scenario that New data has to be uploaded in the database and presented in multiple applications - desktop, web and mobile.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is there are 2 options to upload this data &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. As a subtype to existing featureclass and present as part of the existing layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. As a new featureclass and present as a new feature layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which of the above options is better with respect to performance (map loading, navigation, spatial querying)? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in Advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sresree&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:08:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237926#M13494</guid>
      <dc:creator>SreejaS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-29T13:08:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237927#M13495</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey Sreeja,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many features would this particular data have? How many features would the feature service have that you would in cooperate the new data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think it really depends on the quantity and size of the feature services, that you would be using.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237927#M13495</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimWitt2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-29T19:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237928#M13496</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are 2 layers - one point and another polygon. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new points are around a lakh.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing points are in tens of lakhs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new polygons are in thousands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing polygons are around tens of thousands.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which approach would benefit performance of the overall application presenting new and existing data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sreeja.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237928#M13496</guid>
      <dc:creator>SreejaS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T10:23:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237929#M13497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sreeja,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;since it is such a vast amount of features, I would create new feature classes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:40:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237929#M13497</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimWitt2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T13:40:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237930#M13498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Tim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the reply. But this data is part of a Geometric Network. The question we have is will it hamper the performance of the network if we add a new layer than a subtype to an existing featureclass?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sreeja S. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:02:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237930#M13498</guid>
      <dc:creator>SreejaS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-02T16:02:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237931#M13499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Sreeja, which option did you use and how was the performance of the network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 14:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237931#M13499</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelaRondon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-11T14:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Subtype or New featureclass for better performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237932#M13500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if I am too late in answering this. We opted a new feature class. Performance of geometric network has come down but the decision was not purely based on performance alone, but on several other criteria. A new layer in the network is expected to bring down performance. More details can be found at &lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//002r00000004000000" title="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//002r00000004000000"&gt;http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//002r00000004000000&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//002r00000004000000" title="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#//002r00000004000000"&gt;ArcGIS Help 10.1&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &amp;amp; Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sreeja S.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:21:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/subtype-or-new-featureclass-for-better-performance/m-p/237932#M13500</guid>
      <dc:creator>SreejaS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-09T17:21:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

