<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic problems with Erase tool in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20263#M1076</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the erase tool to remove the area covered by one feature class (269 sq mi) from another feature class (1617 sq mi). 1617-269 = 1348. However, the result of the erase gives me a feature class that covers 1391 square miles. I expect a little discrepancy, but 43 square miles difference seems like a lot to me. The the only setting for the erase tool is XY tolerance, which I have played with, but it has not helped me. Is there anything that I can do about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PeterLecourt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-14T00:11:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>problems with Erase tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20263#M1076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using the erase tool to remove the area covered by one feature class (269 sq mi) from another feature class (1617 sq mi). 1617-269 = 1348. However, the result of the erase gives me a feature class that covers 1391 square miles. I expect a little discrepancy, but 43 square miles difference seems like a lot to me. The the only setting for the erase tool is XY tolerance, which I have played with, but it has not helped me. Is there anything that I can do about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20263#M1076</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterLecourt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-14T00:11:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with Erase tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20264#M1077</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you delete all your duplicate posts.&amp;nbsp; I will move this to managing data where it will get some attention.&amp;nbsp; In the future you can use the 'Share' option to the upper right of your post... it will get shared and not make duplicates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20264#M1077</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-14T00:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with Erase tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20265#M1078</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry about that. Thanks for this info. Wasn't sure how to make a post so it was viewed by a wider audience. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20265#M1078</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterLecourt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-14T00:42:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with Erase tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20266#M1079</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure both the data have same projection system (Projected Coordinate System) along with the output feature class.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 05:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20266#M1079</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayantaPoddar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-14T05:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: problems with Erase tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20267#M1080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Make sure that :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Erase feature is totally within Input feature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can use intersect tool for the two feature classes and check&amp;nbsp; geometry area.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finally calculate the area for Erased feature or intersect feature according to same projection along with input feature and erase feature and data frame. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/problems-with-erase-tool/m-p/20267#M1080</guid>
      <dc:creator>AbdullahAnter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-14T21:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

