<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Euclidean Distance in Global Datasets in Data Management Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/euclidean-distance-in-global-datasets/m-p/177889#M10036</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: tonalca6864&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need to do some euclidean distance on a global scale. I find that there is no a natural continuation at the edges due to the Maximum distance option set to default. I've tried with different values always with the same output.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I wonder if someone can suggest a way round this so I can get a continuous raster dataset instead of a sharp differentiation at the edges.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please see images attached.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Many thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31210[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31211[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31212[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:02:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-07T08:02:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Euclidean Distance in Global Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/euclidean-distance-in-global-datasets/m-p/177889#M10036</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: tonalca6864&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need to do some euclidean distance on a global scale. I find that there is no a natural continuation at the edges due to the Maximum distance option set to default. I've tried with different values always with the same output.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I wonder if someone can suggest a way round this so I can get a continuous raster dataset instead of a sharp differentiation at the edges.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Please see images attached.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Many thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31210[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31211[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]31212[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 08:02:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/euclidean-distance-in-global-datasets/m-p/177889#M10036</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-07T08:02:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Euclidean Distance in Global Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/euclidean-distance-in-global-datasets/m-p/177890#M10037</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: swalbridge&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Euclidean Distance tool isn't geodesic aware, and assumes that the analysis is being performed Cartesian space (i.e. there's no relationship between -180 and 180). There are a few ways to fix this, perhaps the simplest is to use the tools within Data Management &amp;gt; Projections and Transformations &amp;gt; Raster, in particular Shift, to create a version which spans 0-360 degrees,&amp;nbsp; centered on the -180/180 anti-meridian. From there, you should be able to perform a second Euclidean distance calculation and get more sensible results, then merge those two results back together.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But probably better than just doing this is to use a projected space for your analysis -- in unprojected space, measurements of distance vary both by latitude and longitude, so particularly as you head to the poles, the distance of one cell shifts pretty dramatically. A couple of ways of dealing with this include rescaling distances by how far they are from the equator, or using a projected space for your calculations. Using a projection is probably your best bet if you need precision in the answer.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;cheers,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Shaun&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-questions/euclidean-distance-in-global-datasets/m-p/177890#M10037</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-13T00:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

