<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Change alpha-numeric sorting to match reality in Data Management Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/change-alpha-numeric-sorting-to-match-reality/idi-p/938481</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I had numbers 1-10 in an attribute table and sorted by this field the number 10 would be placed between 1 and 2. Logically it should come after 9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If I had the lower-case letters a-z, and upper-case A-Z in another field and sorted by that, the letters we be ordered as A,B,C...Z,a,b,c...z. In the real world 'a' comes before 'Z' regardless of case.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The same sorting is used in catalog, its ilogical there too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My idea is that the sorting algorithm is reengineered to be more logical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E0000000CvDC  --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChrisRichardson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-01T19:37:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Change alpha-numeric sorting to match reality</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/change-alpha-numeric-sorting-to-match-reality/idi-p/938481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I had numbers 1-10 in an attribute table and sorted by this field the number 10 would be placed between 1 and 2. Logically it should come after 9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;If I had the lower-case letters a-z, and upper-case A-Z in another field and sorted by that, the letters we be ordered as A,B,C...Z,a,b,c...z. In the real world 'a' comes before 'Z' regardless of case.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The same sorting is used in catalog, its ilogical there too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My idea is that the sorting algorithm is reengineered to be more logical.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E0000000CvDC  --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 19:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/change-alpha-numeric-sorting-to-match-reality/idi-p/938481</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisRichardson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T19:37:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Change alpha-numeric sorting to match reality - Status changed to: Already Offered</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/change-alpha-numeric-sorting-to-match-reality/idc-p/1212566#M1956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the idea!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In ArcGIS Pro, sorting attribute tables works just as you've suggested!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorting numbers will result in records arranged in logical numerical order. A record with value 10 is placed between 9 and 11, and not between 1 and 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorting records by a text field will arrange records in alphabetical order regardless of the capitalization of the entry in the sort field. &amp;nbsp;'a' and 'A' a no longer separated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This idea will be closed as already offered. Thank you for the suggestion.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 17:39:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/change-alpha-numeric-sorting-to-match-reality/idc-p/1212566#M1956</guid>
      <dc:creator>SSWoodward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-14T17:39:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

