<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets in Data Management Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idi-p/930385</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently ESRI'S SDE geodatabase has performance degradation issues when adding, deleting, or making attribution changes on features when the SDE utilizes a Topology on a large dataset (example: 30,000 polygons representing land parcels and five rules involving three Feature Classes).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;According to ESRI, this slowness should be expected on SQL Server, Oracle, and PostgreSQL when a topology feature class is used. The database is performing checks on "dirty areas" when edits are made causing the process to be slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest making a modification to the enterprise geodatabase design to handle edits in a way that does not degrade speed while using toplogies or &lt;SPAN&gt;add the Disable Network Topology functionality to non-network topologies. A enhancement request has been logged with ESRI for such a tool:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ENH-000122376&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-06T18:46:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932465#M1767</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently ESRI'S SDE geodatabase has performance degradation issues when adding, deleting, or making attribution changes on features when the SDE utilizes a Topology on a large dataset (example: 30,000 polygons representing land parcels and five rules involving three Feature Classes).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;According to ESRI, this slowness should be expected on SQL Server, Oracle, and PostgreSQL when a topology feature class is used. The database is performing checks on "dirty areas" when edits are made causing the process to be slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest making a modification to the enterprise geodatabase design to handle edits in a way that does not degrade speed while using toplogies or &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;add the Disable Network Topology functionality to non-network topologies. A enhancement request has been logged with ESRI for such a tool:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ENH-000122376&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2019 20:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932465#M1767</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-16T20:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idi-p/930385</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently ESRI'S SDE geodatabase has performance degradation issues when adding, deleting, or making attribution changes on features when the SDE utilizes a Topology on a large dataset (example: 30,000 polygons representing land parcels and five rules involving three Feature Classes).&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;According to ESRI, this slowness should be expected on SQL Server, Oracle, and PostgreSQL when a topology feature class is used. The database is performing checks on "dirty areas" when edits are made causing the process to be slow.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I suggest making a modification to the enterprise geodatabase design to handle edits in a way that does not degrade speed while using toplogies or &lt;SPAN&gt;add the Disable Network Topology functionality to non-network topologies. A enhancement request has been logged with ESRI for such a tool:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;ENH-000122376&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idi-p/930385</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-06T18:46:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932466#M1768</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was the documentation cited in the enhancement request:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/topologies/validating-a-topology.htm#GUID-93AD1CA1-0AB2-4D00-A01C-71CF51AB72B7"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/topologies/validating-a-topology.htm#GUID-93AD1CA1-0AB2-4D00-A01C-71CF51AB72B7&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 14:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932466#M1768</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T14:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930386#M719</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was the documentation cited in the enhancement request:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/topologies/validating-a-topology.htm#GUID-93AD1CA1-0AB2-4D00-A01C-71CF51AB72B7"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/topologies/validating-a-topology.htm#GUID-93AD1CA1-0AB2-4D00-A01C-71CF51AB72B7&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 14:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930386#M719</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T14:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932467#M1769</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cory:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you seeing this degradation in ArcMap or Pro?&amp;nbsp; It's unclear to me from your idea and Kory's links shows Pro help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 14:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932467#M1769</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T14:26:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930387#M720</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cory:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you seeing this degradation in ArcMap or Pro?&amp;nbsp; It's unclear to me from your idea and Kory's links shows Pro help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 14:26:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930387#M720</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T14:26:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932468#M1770</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This slow performance occurs in Pro and in desktop 10.6, 10.6.1, and 10.7.&amp;nbsp; The issue was also reproduced by ESRI on their hardware and even with other data.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 19:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932468#M1770</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T19:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930388#M721</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This slow performance occurs in Pro and in desktop 10.6, 10.6.1, and 10.7.&amp;nbsp; The issue was also reproduced by ESRI on their hardware and even with other data.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 19:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930388#M721</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-17T19:39:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932469#M1771</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cory,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you have any suggested steps for working around this issue until the tool that you mentioned might be introduced?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932469#M1771</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshMcCracken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-07T18:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930389#M722</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cory,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you have any suggested steps for working around this issue until the tool that you mentioned might be introduced?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930389#M722</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshMcCracken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-07T18:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932470#M1772</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Temporarly turning off the topolgy rules should do it. Unfortunately with the environment that I had this sde deployed in, it would cause the sde replication to break if you modify the topolgy rules. So turning them off wasn't an option in my situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another idea I had, even with the replication, was to deploy the replication using sde binary storage type. One problem with this possibility is sde binary is deprecated in pro. I never got to test this theory but several clues led me to believe it may work. I did try other storage types that did not make a difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932470#M1772</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-08T15:49:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930390#M723</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Temporarly turning off the topolgy rules should do it. Unfortunately with the environment that I had this sde deployed in, it would cause the sde replication to break if you modify the topolgy rules. So turning them off wasn't an option in my situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another idea I had, even with the replication, was to deploy the replication using sde binary storage type. One problem with this possibility is sde binary is deprecated in pro. I never got to test this theory but several clues led me to believe it may work. I did try other storage types that did not make a difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 15:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930390#M723</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-08T15:49:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932471#M1773</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just tried using the data in an SDE Binary storage type, and it made no difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 21:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932471#M1773</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-13T21:36:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930391#M724</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just tried using the data in an SDE Binary storage type, and it made no difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 21:36:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930391#M724</guid>
      <dc:creator>CoryBowlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-13T21:36:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932472#M1774</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This became such a drag on performance that we had to escalate the request to premium support, and they were able to find the resolution for us a couple of months ago.&amp;nbsp; What worked for us was in SQL Server under database properties for the enterprise geodatabase, we had to change two properties under Options.&amp;nbsp; Within the Miscellaneous heading there are the following properties:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Allow Snapshot Isolation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is Read Committed Snapshot On&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that both of these options default to False.&amp;nbsp; The support analyst changed them to true and tested the workflow successfully.&amp;nbsp; We were able to confirm that these settings were in fact the issue, at least for our environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/932472#M1774</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshMcCracken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T17:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SDE Performance Degradation Using Topology with Large Datasets</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930392#M725</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This became such a drag on performance that we had to escalate the request to premium support, and they were able to find the resolution for us a couple of months ago.&amp;nbsp; What worked for us was in SQL Server under database properties for the enterprise geodatabase, we had to change two properties under Options.&amp;nbsp; Within the Miscellaneous heading there are the following properties:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Allow Snapshot Isolation&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is Read Committed Snapshot On&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that both of these options default to False.&amp;nbsp; The support analyst changed them to true and tested the workflow successfully.&amp;nbsp; We were able to confirm that these settings were in fact the issue, at least for our environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/sde-performance-degradation-using-topology-with/idc-p/930392#M725</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoshMcCracken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T17:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

