idea Improve FGDB API with row::getatrributes as byte[] stream in Data Management Ideas https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/improve-fgdb-api-with-row-getatrributes-as-byte/idi-p/928552 <P><SPAN><SPAN>To accelerate</SPAN> <SPAN>the reading of</SPAN> <SPAN>file</SPAN> <SPAN>geodatabases</SPAN> <SPAN>with</SPAN> <SPAN>FGDB</SPAN> API <SPAN>think</SPAN> <SPAN>interesting</SPAN>&nbsp;<SPAN>to implement a</SPAN> <SPAN>similar</SPAN> <SPAN>method</SPAN> <SPAN>to</SPAN> <SPAN>GetGeometry</SPAN> <SPAN>() but for</SPAN> <SPAN>the set of attributes</SPAN><SPAN>.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>This method could</SPAN> <SPAN>take the form</SPAN> <SPAN>....</SPAN><BR /><BR /><STRONG><SPAN>byte[</SPAN><SPAN>]</SPAN> <SPAN>Row:</SPAN><SPAN>:GetAttributes</SPAN><SPAN>()</SPAN><BR /></STRONG><BR /><BR /><SPAN>And it would be</SPAN> <SPAN>the responsibility of the</SPAN> <SPAN>developer,</SPAN> <SPAN>or a</SPAN> <SPAN>helper</SPAN> <SPAN>class</SPAN> <SPAN>parsing</SPAN> <SPAN>of attributes</SPAN> <SPAN>based on</SPAN> <SPAN>field names</SPAN><SPAN>, or their</SPAN> <SPAN>indexes on the table</SPAN> <SPAN>of attributes.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>If any,</SPAN> <SPAN>would</SPAN> <SPAN>be</SPAN> <SPAN>postponed</SPAN> <SPAN>if possible</SPAN> <SPAN>reading</SPAN> <SPAN>attributes.</SPAN> <SPAN>And it allows</SPAN> <SPAN>a</SPAN> <SPAN>much faster</SPAN> <SPAN>reading of a feature layer</SPAN><SPAN>.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><BR /><SPAN>More</SPAN> <SPAN>...</SPAN></SPAN><BR /><BR /><A href="http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/33528-Slow-performance-reading-FGDB" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/33528-Slow-performance-reading-FGDB</A><BR /><BR />thank you very much</P><!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000bpA3 --> Thu, 01 Sep 2022 21:41:56 GMT ahuarte 2022-09-01T21:41:56Z Improve FGDB API with row::getatrributes as byte[] stream https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/improve-fgdb-api-with-row-getatrributes-as-byte/idi-p/928552 <P><SPAN><SPAN>To accelerate</SPAN> <SPAN>the reading of</SPAN> <SPAN>file</SPAN> <SPAN>geodatabases</SPAN> <SPAN>with</SPAN> <SPAN>FGDB</SPAN> API <SPAN>think</SPAN> <SPAN>interesting</SPAN>&nbsp;<SPAN>to implement a</SPAN> <SPAN>similar</SPAN> <SPAN>method</SPAN> <SPAN>to</SPAN> <SPAN>GetGeometry</SPAN> <SPAN>() but for</SPAN> <SPAN>the set of attributes</SPAN><SPAN>.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>This method could</SPAN> <SPAN>take the form</SPAN> <SPAN>....</SPAN><BR /><BR /><STRONG><SPAN>byte[</SPAN><SPAN>]</SPAN> <SPAN>Row:</SPAN><SPAN>:GetAttributes</SPAN><SPAN>()</SPAN><BR /></STRONG><BR /><BR /><SPAN>And it would be</SPAN> <SPAN>the responsibility of the</SPAN> <SPAN>developer,</SPAN> <SPAN>or a</SPAN> <SPAN>helper</SPAN> <SPAN>class</SPAN> <SPAN>parsing</SPAN> <SPAN>of attributes</SPAN> <SPAN>based on</SPAN> <SPAN>field names</SPAN><SPAN>, or their</SPAN> <SPAN>indexes on the table</SPAN> <SPAN>of attributes.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>If any,</SPAN> <SPAN>would</SPAN> <SPAN>be</SPAN> <SPAN>postponed</SPAN> <SPAN>if possible</SPAN> <SPAN>reading</SPAN> <SPAN>attributes.</SPAN> <SPAN>And it allows</SPAN> <SPAN>a</SPAN> <SPAN>much faster</SPAN> <SPAN>reading of a feature layer</SPAN><SPAN>.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><BR /><SPAN>More</SPAN> <SPAN>...</SPAN></SPAN><BR /><BR /><A href="http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/33528-Slow-performance-reading-FGDB" target="_blank" rel="noopener">http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/33528-Slow-performance-reading-FGDB</A><BR /><BR />thank you very much</P><!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000bpA3 --> Thu, 01 Sep 2022 21:41:56 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/improve-fgdb-api-with-row-getatrributes-as-byte/idi-p/928552 ahuarte 2022-09-01T21:41:56Z