<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow Registered Database Views As the Destination Table in Relationship Classes in Data Management Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idi-p/1112224</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Allow the Destination table in a relationship class to be a registered database view. The relationship wouldn't support any features that a view would prohibit (no composite relationships, no message passing etc.) but could be used to link database view records to a parent feature or record in apps such as Field Maps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main use of this feature in my organization would be to create a view of an entire archive table or branch versioned table in the EGDB, register that view, then allow users to jump to a list of archived records directly from a feature in various apps. To my knowledge there is no consistent method of relating data in ArcGIS without a relationship class in the database and this seems more pragmatic than defining a new relationship type at the Server/AGOL/Enterprise level.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 21:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DavidSolari</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-27T21:53:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Support Relationship Classes on Database Views</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/935873#M1786</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Support for creating Relationship Classes on registred Database Views was dropped in ArcGIS &amp;gt; 10.2.2. Please reactivate this Functionality in future Releases of ArcGIS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:35:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/935873#M1786</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasJurk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T10:35:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Registered Database Views As the Destination Table in Relationship Classes</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idi-p/1112224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Allow the Destination table in a relationship class to be a registered database view. The relationship wouldn't support any features that a view would prohibit (no composite relationships, no message passing etc.) but could be used to link database view records to a parent feature or record in apps such as Field Maps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The main use of this feature in my organization would be to create a view of an entire archive table or branch versioned table in the EGDB, register that view, then allow users to jump to a list of archived records directly from a feature in various apps. To my knowledge there is no consistent method of relating data in ArcGIS without a relationship class in the database and this seems more pragmatic than defining a new relationship type at the Server/AGOL/Enterprise level.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2022 21:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idi-p/1112224</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidSolari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-27T21:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow Registered Database Views As the Destination Table in Relationship Classes</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/1159100#M1824</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is so much Esri functionality that needs to support database views.&amp;nbsp; This is one of those things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/1159100#M1824</guid>
      <dc:creator>AdamStewart</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-29T20:30:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow Registered Database Views As the Destination Table in Relationship Classes</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/1331364#M2270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We absolutely need this in order to not having to write view content back to a physical table.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 07:55:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/allow-registered-database-views-as-the-destination/idc-p/1331364#M2270</guid>
      <dc:creator>GillesLavandier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-22T07:55:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

