<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Append similar in Data Management Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/append-similar/idi-p/1027226</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Problem:&amp;nbsp; Datasets have different domains that mean the same thing&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&amp;nbsp; Street Suffix' can be provided in different formats when they need to be joined you have to substitute the data manually&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ie:&amp;nbsp; Crt, Ct, Court&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution: Have a thesaurus/catalog type option where if the data contains part of these suffix to be joined in the record it recognises its similar and joins&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JulieCulligan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-17T14:13:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Append similar</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/append-similar/idi-p/1027226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Problem:&amp;nbsp; Datasets have different domains that mean the same thing&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Example:&amp;nbsp; Street Suffix' can be provided in different formats when they need to be joined you have to substitute the data manually&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ie:&amp;nbsp; Crt, Ct, Court&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution: Have a thesaurus/catalog type option where if the data contains part of these suffix to be joined in the record it recognises its similar and joins&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:13:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/append-similar/idi-p/1027226</guid>
      <dc:creator>JulieCulligan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-17T14:13:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Append similar</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/append-similar/idc-p/1042995#M1727</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A quick suggestion on the title of this one - it would better if it were "Join similar" rather than "Append similar"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I got some input from a colleague on this one, and something that could work in this situation would be to generate a translation table:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oid, desc, code&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1, court, 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2, ct, 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3, crt, 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4, street, 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5, st, 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6, ave, 3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Etc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And now 3 tiers of joins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Join Origin table (street suffix) to translation table ‘desc’ == join1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Join Destination table (street suffix) to translation table ‘desc’ == join2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then join1.code == join2.code == Final result (hide the fields you don’t want to see).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also if they are really different domains, then the key is the code stored in the data, not the description. If the codes are different, then you need the pattern described, if the codes are the same but the descriptions are different, then no problem the join will work at the db level.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 17:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/append-similar/idc-p/1042995#M1727</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-01T17:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

