<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Add definition query to relationship class in Data Management Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/add-definition-query-to-relationship-class/idi-p/970411</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When setting up a relationship class, it would be nice if a definition query or filter could be applied. For example, I have a layer of polygon that contains bituminous, concrete and gravel surfaces. I also have a table of maintenance history for the bituminous only. I have the two related and it sometime causes issues when a user adds a related record from the attribute editor or when accessing the related table some other way such as through identify.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are workarounds that can achieve the above within an MXD, but they don't mitigate a user accessing the data base directly and bringing unfiltered data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000004Zp3  --&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SimonMorgan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-26T00:04:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Add definition query to relationship class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/add-definition-query-to-relationship-class/idi-p/970411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When setting up a relationship class, it would be nice if a definition query or filter could be applied. For example, I have a layer of polygon that contains bituminous, concrete and gravel surfaces. I also have a table of maintenance history for the bituminous only. I have the two related and it sometime causes issues when a user adds a related record from the attribute editor or when accessing the related table some other way such as through identify.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are workarounds that can achieve the above within an MXD, but they don't mitigate a user accessing the data base directly and bringing unfiltered data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!--  content transformation source ID: 087E00000004Zp3  --&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2022 00:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/add-definition-query-to-relationship-class/idi-p/970411</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimonMorgan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-26T00:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Add definition query to relationship class</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/add-definition-query-to-relationship-class/idc-p/970412#M1183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Yes, that would be very useful!

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000006GtCR --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 13:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/data-management-ideas/add-definition-query-to-relationship-class/idc-p/970412#M1183</guid>
      <dc:creator>MatejTacer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-15T13:28:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

