<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: UTM zone map of Earth in Coordinate Reference Systems Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775922#M353</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly... politically influenced..., but more likely...to make the 'math' work since 2 x 6°s = 12 ° for 2 zones...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"On the southwest coast of &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway" title="Norway"&gt;Norway&lt;/A&gt;, grid zone 32V (9° of longitude in width) is extended further west, and grid zone 31V (3° of longitude in width) is correspondingly shrunk to cover only open water."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that it was more convenient to have the landmass of Norway be within the 32V zone and the fiddly-bits (aka water) appear on its own, ergo, 9° + 3° = 12° which covers zones 32V and 31V nicely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3120"&gt;Melita Kennedy&lt;/A&gt;‌ might wish to weigh in on this in case there is some obscure reason otherwise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-30T18:15:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>UTM zone map of Earth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775919#M350</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the UTM zone map of earth, all the zones are of 6 degree in width. Why is that the Zones 31(Row V) and 32(Row V) are of unequal widths? Also the zones 31(row X) is followed by zone 33(row X) till zone 37. What is the reason for this? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775919#M350</guid>
      <dc:creator>VaibhavChhipa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T14:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UTM zone map of Earth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775920#M351</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Transverse_Mercator_coordinate_system"&gt;Wikipedia... exceptions section&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; see the references within as well&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775920#M351</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T17:08:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UTM zone map of Earth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775921#M352</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did get the answer for the 31V and 32V grid zones but is there any reason as to why that has been done for that area only to include the open waters perfectly in a grid. Also as to why 32X, 34X and 36X have not been used. This is just out of curiosity but what I require is the &lt;STRONG&gt;specific reason&lt;/STRONG&gt; as to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;why&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; was that done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:49:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775921#M352</guid>
      <dc:creator>VaibhavChhipa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T17:49:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UTM zone map of Earth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775922#M353</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly... politically influenced..., but more likely...to make the 'math' work since 2 x 6°s = 12 ° for 2 zones...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"On the southwest coast of &lt;A href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norway" title="Norway"&gt;Norway&lt;/A&gt;, grid zone 32V (9° of longitude in width) is extended further west, and grid zone 31V (3° of longitude in width) is correspondingly shrunk to cover only open water."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It appears that it was more convenient to have the landmass of Norway be within the 32V zone and the fiddly-bits (aka water) appear on its own, ergo, 9° + 3° = 12° which covers zones 32V and 31V nicely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3120"&gt;Melita Kennedy&lt;/A&gt;‌ might wish to weigh in on this in case there is some obscure reason otherwise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:15:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775922#M353</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T18:15:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: UTM zone map of Earth</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775923#M354</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know except what I've read of people answers when the same question was asked on gis.SE &lt;A href="http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/2561/what-was-the-rationale-for-the-non-standard-utm-zones-near-norway"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Most likely to accommodate Svalbard)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 20:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/utm-zone-map-of-earth/m-p/775923#M354</guid>
      <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-30T20:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

