<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84 in Coordinate Reference Systems Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025265#M1952</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;to get the discussion going &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; many people in this forum have fare more knowledge in the field of geodesy than me. I have seen that being a bit "sluggish" in a reply often get the discussion going &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WGS84 and the CGVD13 are two very different things. WGS84 is a mathematically defined earth-centered earth-fixed (ECEF) datum. The CGVD13 is a gravity-related datum/geoid model. The geoid model gives (at any point within its valid extent) the height difference between the CGVD13 and the reference ellipsoid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/maps/height-reference-system-modernization/9054#two" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/maps/height-reference-system-modernization/9054#two&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So is the "CGVD13 and WGS84 ellipsoid near equal?" No - there is a (geoid) separation between the two. I dont know the difference. For the same separation in Norway we have 20 - 50 meters (geoid above ellipsoid).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers, pH&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-10T09:46:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025128#M1951</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;I'm wondering if it is necessary to apply a transformation from CGVD13 to WGS84?&lt;/U&gt; I have a large dataset of hydrographic soundings obtained with GCS WGS84 and a reference water surface elevation (WSE) obtained with CGVD13. I need to subtract the WSE from all depth soundings to get a true bed surface elevation. I can't find any references online that provide a simple or straightforward answer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From what I gather here,&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/maps/height-reference-system-modernization/9054#two" target="_blank"&gt;Height Reference System Modernization (nrcan.gc.ca)&lt;/A&gt;, CGVD13 uses the CGG2013a realization which is 'synonymous' (?) with NAD83(CSRS)/ITRF2008 realizations. Then from other sources, WGS84 is 'synonymous' with ITRF2008. So does that make the CGVD13 and WGS84 ellipsoid near equal?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm relatively new to this topic and have found it quite a struggle to wrap my head around these seemingly endless transformations and coordinate systems...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is greatly appreciated!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 03:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025128#M1951</guid>
      <dc:creator>Schillz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T03:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025265#M1952</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;to get the discussion going &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; many people in this forum have fare more knowledge in the field of geodesy than me. I have seen that being a bit "sluggish" in a reply often get the discussion going &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WGS84 and the CGVD13 are two very different things. WGS84 is a mathematically defined earth-centered earth-fixed (ECEF) datum. The CGVD13 is a gravity-related datum/geoid model. The geoid model gives (at any point within its valid extent) the height difference between the CGVD13 and the reference ellipsoid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/maps/height-reference-system-modernization/9054#two" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/maps-tools-publications/maps/height-reference-system-modernization/9054#two&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So is the "CGVD13 and WGS84 ellipsoid near equal?" No - there is a (geoid) separation between the two. I dont know the difference. For the same separation in Norway we have 20 - 50 meters (geoid above ellipsoid).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;cheers, pH&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:46:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025265#M1952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T09:46:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025368#M1953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks pH,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your description helps clarify that a transformation is indeed necessary. &lt;U&gt;Which leads me to the next question of how do I apply a transformation between these two vertical datums&lt;/U&gt;? CGVD13 --&amp;gt; WGS84. Currently, my research has only stumbled upon a transformation from CGVD1928--&amp;gt;CGVD2013.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 15:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1025368#M1953</guid>
      <dc:creator>Schillz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-10T15:24:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1026014#M1954</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you, &lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/213462"&gt;@Schillz&lt;/a&gt;, for your question and&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/341726"&gt;@Pål_Herman_Sund&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for your assistance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;First, the theory...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/341726"&gt;@Pål_Herman_Sund&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;already said, "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;WGS 1984 and the CGVD 2013 are two very different things&lt;/EM&gt;."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;CGVD 2013 (WKID::6647) is &lt;STRONG&gt;gravity-related&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;vertical coordinate system (datum). WGS 1984 is geographic coordinate system (WKID::4326) and vertical coordinate system (WKID::115700) with &lt;STRONG&gt;positions and ellipsoidal heights&lt;/STRONG&gt;, which you natively get from GPS observations. The first realization of&amp;nbsp;CGVD 2013 is through&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Canadian Gravimetric Geoid model of 2013 – Version A&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;(CGG2013a) in&amp;nbsp;NAD83(CSRS) and ITRF2008. This basically means that geoid undulations (difference between ellipsoidal&amp;nbsp;heights and orthometric heights) are provided between&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NAD 1983 (CSRS) &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;or&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;ITRF 2008 ellipsoidal heights&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;and&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;CGVD 2013&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;orthometric heights &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;based on positions&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NAD 1983 (CSRS)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; or&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ITRF 2008 geographic coordinates&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To correctly transform between CGVD 2013 and WGS 1984 heights, it can be done in two steps:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;GCS:&amp;nbsp;NAD 1983 (CSRS) / VCS:&amp;nbsp;CGVD 2013&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;lt;- - - vertical transformation with geoid model - - -&amp;gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;GCS:&amp;nbsp;NAD 1983 (CSRS) / VCS: NAD 1983 (CSRS)&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;lt;- - - 3D geographic transformation(s) - - -&amp;gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;GCS: WGS 1984 / VCS: WGS 1984&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note, your&amp;nbsp;CGVD 2013 height data must be in&amp;nbsp;NAD 1983 (CSRS) or ITRF 2008 positions, so you can transform them with the geoid model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, the practice...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In ArcGIS Pro, you can transform your 3D vector and raster data with Project and Project Raster tools, by checking Vertical checkbox in the tool. The vertical checkbox becomes available&amp;nbsp;when you add 3D data to the tool and set horizontal and vertical output coordinate systems.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="BojanŠavrič_0-1613070348890.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5857iFF8317AA456BAA91/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="BojanŠavrič_0-1613070348890.png" alt="BojanŠavrič_0-1613070348890.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Unfortunately, we don't have any vertical transformations for Canada yet. Vertical transformation for&amp;nbsp;CGVD 2013 is on our list, but&amp;nbsp;some other projects came up and we haven't been able to get to it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 19:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1026014#M1954</guid>
      <dc:creator>BojanŠavrič</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-11T19:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Vertical Datum Transformations: CGVD13 to WGS84</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1027308#M1956</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/408398"&gt;@BojanŠavrič&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for the assistance and clear explanation. This is certainly helpful and answers my question concisely!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:27:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/vertical-datum-transformations-cgvd13-to-wgs84/m-p/1027308#M1956</guid>
      <dc:creator>Schillz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-16T20:27:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

