<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcMap-SPCS Zone Edge Distortions in Coordinate Reference Systems Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878519#M1850</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can't speak for state plane, but in older UTM maps in Canada at scales of 1:50,000, there used to be vertical shifts along the edges of map sheet adjacent polygons.&amp;nbsp; I would suspect/hope that such artifacts would be 'corrected' in digital versions.&amp;nbsp; As a test, crank 2 adjoining map sheet up and have a look&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-04T12:04:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcMap-SPCS Zone Edge Distortions</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878518#M1849</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using ArcMap 10.4.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am still reviewing the basics of map projections and came across the concept of planar projections not fully touching at edges, due to distortion, if for example, the globe was&amp;nbsp;projected using a planar stereographic type Planar Projection.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; However, I it seems to me that&amp;nbsp;none of the State Plane zones would likely&amp;nbsp;"stich" together seamlessly at the edges either.&amp;nbsp; But I also thought one of the advantages of the State Plane System was that it offered continuity between large areas that are projected.&amp;nbsp; So I have to ask, do the State Plane projections between states touch seamlessly at edges, or can one expect a distorted miss-alignment along zone edges ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 11:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878518#M1849</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChuckTurlington</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-04T11:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap-SPCS Zone Edge Distortions</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878519#M1850</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;can't speak for state plane, but in older UTM maps in Canada at scales of 1:50,000, there used to be vertical shifts along the edges of map sheet adjacent polygons.&amp;nbsp; I would suspect/hope that such artifacts would be 'corrected' in digital versions.&amp;nbsp; As a test, crank 2 adjoining map sheet up and have a look&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 12:04:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878519#M1850</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-04T12:04:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap-SPCS Zone Edge Distortions</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878520#M1851</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chuck,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most projections will not "stitch together" on the edges. Polyconic is one that will, normal cylindricals (not transverse or oblique Mercator) as well. A state plane zone is designed for the zone's area, not whether it will match up with neighboring zones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hadn't heard that state plane zones were designed for continuity for large areas (except within a zone). Instead, I think it was to define a coordinate reference system with overall linear distortion no worse than one part in 10000.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2017 16:26:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/arcmap-spcs-zone-edge-distortions/m-p/878520#M1851</guid>
      <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-04T16:26:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

