<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Area calculation consistency over time for thematic maps in Coordinate Reference Systems Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827751#M1113</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What tectonic plate or plates is the data on? Are there other forces that would change coordinates like post-glacial rebound, seismic activity, subsidence, etc.? An area of interest in Australia versus New Mexico versus Washington would likely have different answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-03-11T23:40:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Area calculation consistency over time for thematic maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827750#M1112</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given a large land conservation project that is supposed to be monitored over 100 years and principally uses remote sensing to&amp;nbsp;map and update various thematic classes that change over time with ecological dynamics and land use, I'm trying to understand how changes over this 100 year period in&amp;nbsp;remote sensing datasets and&amp;nbsp;Earth's physical surface (quantified via International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) versions) could affect the area calculations of the project's large strata.&amp;nbsp; What tool or methodology would one follow&amp;nbsp;to transform future datums/coordinate systems to the original version used for baseline area calculations, to&amp;nbsp;maintain consistency between calculations as ITRFs change?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2020 22:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827750#M1112</guid>
      <dc:creator>JosephGrinnell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-10T22:47:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Area calculation consistency over time for thematic maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827751#M1113</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What tectonic plate or plates is the data on? Are there other forces that would change coordinates like post-glacial rebound, seismic activity, subsidence, etc.? An area of interest in Australia versus New Mexico versus Washington would likely have different answers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Melita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827751#M1113</guid>
      <dc:creator>MelitaKennedy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-11T23:40:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Area calculation consistency over time for thematic maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827752#M1114</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3120"&gt;Melita Kennedy&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW my question is simplified at a project scale because that's the ultimate audience.&amp;nbsp;My group administers a national program of forest conservation projects from Alaska to Florida with baseline maps using&amp;nbsp;the State Plane Projection System. In fact, I should have said 125 years because that's the real&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;program’s required project monitoring period.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Basically I’m wondering if this transformation consistency issue and perhaps a recommended&amp;nbsp;methodology need to be included in a project development guidance document we’re trying to complete. Thx for reading!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joe&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 23:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/coordinate-reference-systems-questions/area-calculation-consistency-over-time-for/m-p/827752#M1114</guid>
      <dc:creator>JosephGrinnell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-11T23:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

