<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcPad relationships between spatial tables and non-spatial tables in ArcPad Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681433#M4919</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I currently have 3 tables in a GDB which each have a relationship (1-M) with each other. 2 of them are point feature classes and one is a table with no spatial data. Using Identify on either of the points in Arcmap behaves as expected, showing me the related records within the two other tables. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After checking out the data using the ArcPad toolbar, I load the data into ArcPad and use the Identify tool on either of the points . This result in the form shows me only the related record within the non-spatial table, and appears to ignore the relationship with the other points table. Is this the intended behaviour of am I missing something?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamesNunn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-25T07:07:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcPad relationships between spatial tables and non-spatial tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681433#M4919</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I currently have 3 tables in a GDB which each have a relationship (1-M) with each other. 2 of them are point feature classes and one is a table with no spatial data. Using Identify on either of the points in Arcmap behaves as expected, showing me the related records within the two other tables. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After checking out the data using the ArcPad toolbar, I load the data into ArcPad and use the Identify tool on either of the points . This result in the form shows me only the related record within the non-spatial table, and appears to ignore the relationship with the other points table. Is this the intended behaviour of am I missing something?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 07:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681433#M4919</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesNunn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-25T07:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcPad relationships between spatial tables and non-spatial tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681434#M4920</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is expected behavior.&amp;nbsp; Feature class to feature class relationships are not supported.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Take a look at the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcpad/10.0/help/index.html#//00s10000006v000000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Preparing your data for ArcPad&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; help topic, which discusses data formats which are not supported by the ArcPad Data Manager.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[ATTACH=CONFIG]14646[/ATTACH]&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:00:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681434#M4920</guid>
      <dc:creator>TimHopper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-25T15:00:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcPad relationships between spatial tables and non-spatial tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681435#M4921</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you, for some reason it is hard to find explicit information like this in searches.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 07:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcpad-questions/arcpad-relationships-between-spatial-tables-and/m-p/681435#M4921</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesNunn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-01T07:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

