<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns in ArcMap Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097025#M2975</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I used weave Perl into AMLs.&amp;nbsp; Pretty cool, back then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But ArcGIS Pro and Python 3.x is my story now, and I'm stickin' to it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:09:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1096955#M2972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have several who still use ArcMap Desktop - we have all upgraded to 10.8.1. Our IT Dept. recently reached out to us as they discovered the security issues with the python version that comes in the arcmap build/install of 2.7.18 this is what shows up. How are you to continue to use ArcMap with a security risk that there doesn't seems to be a fix for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE width="1783"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD width="59"&gt;&lt;P&gt;105878&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="97"&gt;&lt;P&gt;EOL/Obsolete Software: Python 2.7.x Detected&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="22"&gt;&lt;P&gt;5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="29"&gt;&lt;P&gt;24&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD width="788"&gt;&lt;P&gt;The system is at high risk of being exposed to security vulnerabilities. Since the vendor no longer provides updates; obsolete software is more vulnerable to viruses and other attacks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1096955#M2972</guid>
      <dc:creator>AliceWilson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T20:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1096973#M2973</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;How are you to continue to use ArcMap with a security risk that there doesn't seems to be a fix for.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a great question!&amp;nbsp; The short answer is something along the lines of; you don't. The security risk is always going to be a problem, and if you think about, it's been there for years.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Python 2.x is old school as opposed to the later 3.x releases and has limited shelf life at best.&amp;nbsp; My agency abandoned ArcMap/ArcCatalog a couple years ago.&amp;nbsp; I don't miss it at all.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 21:07:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1096973#M2973</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T21:07:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097022#M2974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;I don't miss it at all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we are wired differently. I still miss workstation. RESELECT with KEYFILE, PROGRAM SECTION EVEN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AML Forever.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 21:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097022#M2974</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T21:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097025#M2975</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I used weave Perl into AMLs.&amp;nbsp; Pretty cool, back then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But ArcGIS Pro and Python 3.x is my story now, and I'm stickin' to it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097025#M2975</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097026#M2976</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;python 2.7 continues to be patched with security updates... if they are feasible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That warning is just that.&amp;nbsp; The software is End of Life (but that hasn't stopped some of us from still being in this Community &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt; )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, dump arcmap, there is no reason to keep it going since people have had since 2015 to adapt to the newer technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;python 2.7 is 10+ years old. Python is at version 3.10, although Pro toddles along at 3.7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AML... and Avenue, now that was worth keeping&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:20:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097026#M2976</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:20:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097030#M2977</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="C39D3AA3-0988-46F4-9BC1-DE108893BC98.jpeg" style="width: 4032px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/22730iBBFC757F131495CC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="C39D3AA3-0988-46F4-9BC1-DE108893BC98.jpeg" alt="C39D3AA3-0988-46F4-9BC1-DE108893BC98.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097030#M2977</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097034#M2978</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a button I wear at the UC sometime: "My AML from 1996 still works."&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097034#M2978</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:44:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097039#M2979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/215600"&gt;@DanPatterson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;python 2.7 continues to be patched with security updates...&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even if 2.7 got patched, would that not require a new install of the patched version?&amp;nbsp; And how does anyone know when it's been patched?&amp;nbsp; And what has been patched patched?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Having said that, dump arcmap, there is no reason to keep it going since people have had since 2015 to adapt to the newer technology.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Couldn't agree more!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 22:50:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097039#M2979</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-09T22:50:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097055#M2980</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;manual install... patching date would be noted on the floppy disk&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097055#M2980</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-10T00:25:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcMap Python Security Concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097056#M2981</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You’re killing me, Patterson!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The OP is wondering ‘Who are these guys and why can’t I get straight answer out of them?’&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcmap-questions/arcmap-python-security-concerns/m-p/1097056#M2981</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeBorgione</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-10T00:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

