<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Record completion when worker cannot access app in ArcGIS Workforce Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782017#M363</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Craig,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your responses. It is good to know my thoughts on this are not that far off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should all of the Dispatchers in your organization be able to mark assignments as Completed in the web app? &amp;nbsp;Or, should only certain Dispatchers have this ability?&amp;nbsp; If the Project Owner had the ability to mark assignments as Completed, would this work for your scenario?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that any software solution&amp;nbsp;should be coupled with a SOP for dispatchers. As the project owner I would not want to be the one who is always turning on/off a dispatcher's ability to complete an assignment. In&amp;nbsp;my scenario I'm not in the same department as the dispatchers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I &lt;STRONG&gt;would&lt;/STRONG&gt; like to have an option within WF to allow a dispatcher to have the ability to complete an assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could there be multiple levels of dispatchers? A dispatcher lead or supervisor could be given the ability to turn on/off the ability for other dispatchers to complete assignments. This dispatcher's privileges would be somewhere between a project owner and a regular dispatcher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For now I will pursue my original 3rd idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 16:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-09T16:10:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Record completion when worker cannot access app</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782015#M361</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one of our workflows with WF there is a scenario (usually at 455 pm on a Friday) where the dispatcher group cannot make an assignment to a worker for various reasons. The only way to get the assignment out is to start calling around the office. The information gets relayed by voice, the task gets done, a phone call comes back that the assignment is done. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This dispatcher can't go back into the assignment and close it out. Maybe the dispatcher never put it into WF. Either way that data point gets lost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some ideas I have are that every dispatcher could also be a worker. But that would require every dispatcher to install the worker app on their phone which they probably won't do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second idea would be that a dispatcher could complete an assignment they created. They can already cancel an assignment so it would seem that it would be possible for WF developers to add this option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My third idea would be to create separate web map or survey123 form the dispatcher can use to manually edit the HFS and complete the ticket. This is the most do-able thing I can do now although needing to introduce a separate app to a workflow is not ideal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do other people do?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 17:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782015#M361</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T17:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Record completion when worker cannot access app</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782016#M362</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;Couple thoughts on this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Some ideas I have are that every dispatcher could also be a worker. But that would require every dispatcher to install the worker app on their phone which they probably won't do.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;I don't recommend this as a workflow; for the reason you mention but also because you'd now have all these extra workers that could be accidentally assigned work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Second idea would be that a dispatcher could complete an assignment they created. They can already cancel an assignment so it would seem that it would be possible for WF developers to add this option.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;This is something we're considering.&amp;nbsp; Should all of the Dispatchers in your organization be able to mark assignments as Completed in the web app?&amp;nbsp; Or, should only certain Dispatchers have this ability?&amp;nbsp; If the Project Owner had the ability to mark assignments as Completed, would this work for your scenario?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My third idea would be to create separate web map or survey123 form the dispatcher can use to manually edit the HFS and complete the ticket. This is the most do-able thing I can do now although needing to introduce a separate app to a workflow is not ideal.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;Even if we added the before mentioned ability, that would not be available for several months at the earliest.&amp;nbsp; I do recommend the workflow you mention and would suggest that creating a web app to handle this is the way to go.&amp;nbsp; I know of several other users who are using this workflow and it works well for them.&amp;nbsp; From your description; this is not something that Dispatchers need to do often and you can use Web App Builder to create a focused web app for this.&amp;nbsp; If you go this route; you need to consult the Workforce Schema doc and ensure you are setting all the correct values for Completing an assignment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://doc.arcgis.com/en/workforce/android-phone/help/workforce-schema.htm" title="http://doc.arcgis.com/en/workforce/android-phone/help/workforce-schema.htm"&gt;Workforce schema—Workforce for ArcGIS | ArcGIS&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="background-color: #ffffff; border: 0px;"&gt;Craig&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:37:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782016#M362</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigGillgrass</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-06T21:37:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Record completion when worker cannot access app</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782017#M363</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Craig,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your responses. It is good to know my thoughts on this are not that far off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should all of the Dispatchers in your organization be able to mark assignments as Completed in the web app? &amp;nbsp;Or, should only certain Dispatchers have this ability?&amp;nbsp; If the Project Owner had the ability to mark assignments as Completed, would this work for your scenario?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that any software solution&amp;nbsp;should be coupled with a SOP for dispatchers. As the project owner I would not want to be the one who is always turning on/off a dispatcher's ability to complete an assignment. In&amp;nbsp;my scenario I'm not in the same department as the dispatchers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I &lt;STRONG&gt;would&lt;/STRONG&gt; like to have an option within WF to allow a dispatcher to have the ability to complete an assignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could there be multiple levels of dispatchers? A dispatcher lead or supervisor could be given the ability to turn on/off the ability for other dispatchers to complete assignments. This dispatcher's privileges would be somewhere between a project owner and a regular dispatcher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For now I will pursue my original 3rd idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 16:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/record-completion-when-worker-cannot-access-app/m-p/782017#M363</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeOnzay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-09T16:10:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

