<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Workforce Project Size Limitations in ArcGIS Workforce Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/workforce-project-size-limitations/m-p/1355015#M2719</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been discussing with another user their current setup for an ArcGIS Workforce project and would like to pose this question to anybody who is experienced with operating Workforce projects that involve a particularly large layer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, the layer is 600MB but contains 43GB of attachments. This is after having archived content to reduce it down from 65GB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The logs have been reduced and the indexes rebuilt at an earlier stage.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a guarantee to have suffering performance when working with such a large layer in ArcGIS Workforce out in the field? Field workers report the application running slowly, in particular its performance degrades throughout the day.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohnHughson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-30T05:11:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Workforce Project Size Limitations</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/workforce-project-size-limitations/m-p/1355015#M2719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have been discussing with another user their current setup for an ArcGIS Workforce project and would like to pose this question to anybody who is experienced with operating Workforce projects that involve a particularly large layer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, the layer is 600MB but contains 43GB of attachments. This is after having archived content to reduce it down from 65GB.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The logs have been reduced and the indexes rebuilt at an earlier stage.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it a guarantee to have suffering performance when working with such a large layer in ArcGIS Workforce out in the field? Field workers report the application running slowly, in particular its performance degrades throughout the day.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 05:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workforce-questions/workforce-project-size-limitations/m-p/1355015#M2719</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnHughson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-30T05:11:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

