<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Abnormal behavior with Workflow Manager Server on High-Availability Deployment in ArcGIS Workflow Manager Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1267387#M1833</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just adding onto my experience with Ranga's point 2 observation on workflow steps having unwanted/unexpected drop downs. While my Workflow Manager Server is not HA, it is federated to a HA Portal and Enterprise. I would also like to know the cause of why a step that has not been configured to run in parallel (i.e., only having 1 path in and 1 path out) would result in the unwanted/unexpected drop downs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EvaTTA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-14T01:55:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Abnormal behavior with Workflow Manager Server on High-Availability Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1246344#M1769</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We setup a&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="Workflow Manager Server High-availability deployment" href="https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/workflow/10.9.1/install/windows/deployment-scenarios.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Workflow Manager Server High-availability deployment&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;There are 2 Workflow Manager Server instances installed on 2 hosting ArcGIS Server machines.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Listing down the key issues noticed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;While creating workflow jobs, &lt;STRONG&gt;job name indexes&lt;/STRONG&gt; are not getting generated in sequence&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Workflow steps behavior is not consistent (abnormal) e.g. &lt;STRONG&gt;unexpected/unwanted dropdowns&lt;/STRONG&gt; are being shown for steps&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;When initiated multiple jobs, &lt;STRONG&gt;each job halted at different step&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Workflow &lt;STRONG&gt;performance is poor&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our environment has multiple network interface controller (NIC) cards or DNS entries, and we already followed the &lt;A title="Configure ArcGIS Server in advanced scenarios" href="https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/10.9.1/deploy/windows/multiple-nic-cards-dns-entries.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Configure ArcGIS Server in advanced scenarios&lt;/A&gt; documentation to handle it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Environment:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Portal for ArcGIS 10.9.1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ArcGIS Server 10.9.1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ArcGIS Workflow Manager Server 10.9.1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ArcGIS Data Store 10.9.1&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 07:03:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1246344#M1769</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ranga_Tolapi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-09T07:03:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Abnormal behavior with Workflow Manager Server on High-Availability Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1267387#M1833</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just adding onto my experience with Ranga's point 2 observation on workflow steps having unwanted/unexpected drop downs. While my Workflow Manager Server is not HA, it is federated to a HA Portal and Enterprise. I would also like to know the cause of why a step that has not been configured to run in parallel (i.e., only having 1 path in and 1 path out) would result in the unwanted/unexpected drop downs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 01:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1267387#M1833</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvaTTA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T01:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Abnormal behavior with Workflow Manager Server on High-Availability Deployment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1267390#M1834</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hmmm... we are not alone here&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face_with_tongue:"&gt;😜&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A defect bug is logged by Esri for the &lt;STRONG&gt;inconsistency that has been observed with the Job ID creation&lt;/STRONG&gt; in the HA workflow manager. Details of the bug is as follow:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Defect:&amp;nbsp;BUG-000155792&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Synopsis:&amp;nbsp;Workflow Manager jobs not working in High Available site.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Status:&amp;nbsp;In Review&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 02:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-workflow-manager-questions/abnormal-behavior-with-workflow-manager-server-on/m-p/1267390#M1834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ranga_Tolapi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-14T02:42:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

