<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic upper relate limit in ArcGIS Viewer for Flex Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-viewer-for-flex-questions/upper-relate-limit/m-p/542978#M15371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: Richmondgis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there an upper limit to the number of rows in the related table?&amp;nbsp; I have a relate that seems to work well when the number f related items is somewhat small, but when there are a larger number of related items, I get an "Unexpected K encountered at location 2" error message.&amp;nbsp; I still testing to see if this situation holds true throughout the application, and to fine turn the pattern, if any.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just wanted to know if anyone had any additional insight.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James Armstrong&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-12-06T12:20:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>upper relate limit</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-viewer-for-flex-questions/upper-relate-limit/m-p/542978#M15371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: Richmondgis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there an upper limit to the number of rows in the related table?&amp;nbsp; I have a relate that seems to work well when the number f related items is somewhat small, but when there are a larger number of related items, I get an "Unexpected K encountered at location 2" error message.&amp;nbsp; I still testing to see if this situation holds true throughout the application, and to fine turn the pattern, if any.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just wanted to know if anyone had any additional insight.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James Armstrong&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:20:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-viewer-for-flex-questions/upper-relate-limit/m-p/542978#M15371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-06T12:20:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: upper relate limit</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-viewer-for-flex-questions/upper-relate-limit/m-p/542979#M15372</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: Richmondgis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After some more testing, It appears that there is in fact a 1000 record limit to relates in the flex viewer.&amp;nbsp; I feel this limit is too small(i suppose there could be a valid reason), but it would be great to push it up to a much higher figure.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I will submit this to the "ESRI FLEX team"...?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James Armstrong&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-viewer-for-flex-questions/upper-relate-limit/m-p/542979#M15372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-12-06T12:53:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

