<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Topology errors cause additional errors in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/topology-errors-cause-additional-errors/m-p/627975#M620</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently implementing UN on ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 using ArcGIS Pro 2.5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen in our current data migration many Type 8 errors are appearing due to other errors (eg. Type 25 - Stacked points). In the Stacked Points scenario, a junction-edge rules exists for both ElectricJunction to the ElectricLine features which are valid but the Type 8 error appears. It seems like the Type 25 error is causing the rest of topology validation to fail. When the stacked features is resolved (eg. second feature Z value adjusted) and the junction/edge features is&amp;nbsp; untouched, the validation errors disappear when it's revalidated which suggests there was no Type 8 error to begin with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody seen or experienced this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help with this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AnthonyRyanEQL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-05T23:35:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Topology errors cause additional errors</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/topology-errors-cause-additional-errors/m-p/627975#M620</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently implementing UN on ArcGIS Enterprise 10.7.1 using ArcGIS Pro 2.5.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen in our current data migration many Type 8 errors are appearing due to other errors (eg. Type 25 - Stacked points). In the Stacked Points scenario, a junction-edge rules exists for both ElectricJunction to the ElectricLine features which are valid but the Type 8 error appears. It seems like the Type 25 error is causing the rest of topology validation to fail. When the stacked features is resolved (eg. second feature Z value adjusted) and the junction/edge features is&amp;nbsp; untouched, the validation errors disappear when it's revalidated which suggests there was no Type 8 error to begin with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anybody seen or experienced this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help with this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 23:35:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/topology-errors-cause-additional-errors/m-p/627975#M620</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyRyanEQL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-05T23:35:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

