<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - &amp;quot;Validate&amp;quot; should give an error in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535216#M4271</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The only reason to split a mainline would be to place a manhole or valve there.&amp;nbsp; Rather than rely on the editor to follow through with that, I would like it to identify that just splitting a mainline and leaving it like that is not valid.&amp;nbsp; Under the geometric network, it automatically generated a "Network Junction" to indicate the loss of connectivity.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking for something similar here.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 19:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SusanONeill1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-04T19:15:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - "Validate" should give an error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1534959#M4269</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am using a simplified Sewer Utility Network very similar to the "Essential" model in the new ESRI Sewer download.&amp;nbsp; I have an Edge-Junction-Edge rules that a Control Valve can connect 2 Gravity Mains.&amp;nbsp; If I place a Control Valve without splitting the line, Validation gives an error, which is the behavior I want.&amp;nbsp; But if I split a mainline without placing any Device at the split - and run the UN Validation, it does not give an error.&amp;nbsp; I tried using a "New Unnecessary Nodes" Constraint Attribute Rule, since the 2 resulting features will have the same attributes except for Calculated Length, but Validate still said it was fine.&amp;nbsp; So far I haven't used "Terminal Configurations" in my UN.&amp;nbsp; Do I need to use those in order to enforce a rule that you can't just split a mainline in the middle? Thanks for any assistance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:06:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1534959#M4269</guid>
      <dc:creator>SusanONeill1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T15:06:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - "Validate" should give an error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535205#M4270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why would you expect from OOTB behavior that splitting a line should be flagged as an error after running Validate Topology? (I just do not know what your use case requires.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 18:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535205#M4270</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoaquinMadrid1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T18:57:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - "Validate" should give an error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535216#M4271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only reason to split a mainline would be to place a manhole or valve there.&amp;nbsp; Rather than rely on the editor to follow through with that, I would like it to identify that just splitting a mainline and leaving it like that is not valid.&amp;nbsp; Under the geometric network, it automatically generated a "Network Junction" to indicate the loss of connectivity.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking for something similar here.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 19:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535216#M4271</guid>
      <dc:creator>SusanONeill1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T19:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - "Validate" should give an error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535271#M4272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Based on other posts, it sounds like this is the expected behavior for the Utility Network since the Asset Group and Asset Type of the 2 lines are the same.&amp;nbsp; A "System Junction" is created at the intersection.&amp;nbsp; So I need to figure out another way to enforce the behavior I want - it's not built into the UN.&amp;nbsp; I'm not very familiar with Arcade, but there may be a way to create a Constraint Rule to do the same function.&amp;nbsp; I've tried a few of the "Ready to Use Rules" but without success.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 20:25:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535271#M4272</guid>
      <dc:creator>SusanONeill1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-04T20:25:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Network is allowing mainline split without a device - "Validate" should give an error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535482#M4275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I finally found what I needed here:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/finding-system-junctions/td-p/1351529" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/finding-system-junctions/td-p/1351529&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It allows you to view the system junctions.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 14:16:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/utility-network-is-allowing-mainline-split-without/m-p/1535482#M4275</guid>
      <dc:creator>SusanONeill1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-05T14:16:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

