<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intended Sewer UN Editing Workflows in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1478394#M3971</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out of curiosity- what is the intended editing workflow for updating a manhole location in the base model for wastewater UN?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the below image when updating a manhole (structure) location in the Naperville sample data, which seems to stack the pipe connections on top of each other. Is this the intended behavior?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/105328i9E6CB223ED68E123/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" alt="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was a question I encountered as a result of updating manhole locations from GPS sources, but shouldn't the pipe connections remain on the pipes they were connected to initially? Just curious. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 14:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TSmith</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-24T14:29:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intended Sewer UN Editing Workflows</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1478394#M3971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Everyone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out of curiosity- what is the intended editing workflow for updating a manhole location in the base model for wastewater UN?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the below image when updating a manhole (structure) location in the Naperville sample data, which seems to stack the pipe connections on top of each other. Is this the intended behavior?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/105328i9E6CB223ED68E123/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" alt="TSmith_0-1716560885653.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was a question I encountered as a result of updating manhole locations from GPS sources, but shouldn't the pipe connections remain on the pipes they were connected to initially? Just curious. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2024 14:29:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1478394#M3971</guid>
      <dc:creator>TSmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-24T14:29:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intended Sewer UN Editing Workflows</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1480082#M3982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version of ArcGIS Pro?&amp;nbsp; I recall some issues with moving and features collapsing.&amp;nbsp; I am in 3.3 and when I move the Structure Junction, the pipe connections move correctly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MikeMillerGIS_0-1716981977819.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/105619iF931158D520AB951/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MikeMillerGIS_0-1716981977819.png" alt="MikeMillerGIS_0-1716981977819.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="MikeMillerGIS_1-1716982036509.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/105620i3C4956149559551D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="MikeMillerGIS_1-1716982036509.png" alt="MikeMillerGIS_1-1716982036509.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 11:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1480082#M3982</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T11:27:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intended Sewer UN Editing Workflows</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1480128#M3983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;3.1.4, unfortunately my organization is holding off on upgrading to 3.3 across the board, it will likely happen at some point but I can test on 3.3 and see if I have the same issue. Thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 13:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/intended-sewer-un-editing-workflows/m-p/1480128#M3983</guid>
      <dc:creator>TSmith</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-29T13:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

