topic Re: Questions about modifying EUNF v1 in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions

Questions about modifying EUNF v1

BryanMay531 — Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:41:22 GMT

While watching the video: Electric Utility Network: A Deep Dive, I noticed some changes between the current version of the model and version 1 that we are implementing.

Should I make some changes to the model v.1 to be more like v 2.x?

Should I add the field Construction Status to all of the feature classes ( so lifecyclestatus will contain the minimum number of values)?

In the screenshot below, which phase field are they referring to for Operational Status and Phase (in model v.1)?

Re: Questions about modifying EUNF v1

JohnAlsup — Mon, 18 Mar 2024 13:55:53 GMT

As with any change to a model, it could impact your implementation. Some changes are more important than others. In this case the Lifecycle Status and Construction Status changes are significant to make those changes. But, if those are the only changes from the model V2 that you feel are important enough to include, you could just add those changes.

Re: Questions about modifying EUNF v1

BryanMay531 — Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:09:09 GMT

I had added some values to domain for lifecyclestatus. Would it be better to add the ConstructionStatus field and not add any values to the lifecyclestatus? Also, which other fields are inline network attributes in model v1?

Re: Questions about modifying EUNF v1

JohnAlsup — Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:52:57 GMT

When we changed the Lifecyle status, I would not advise adding any values to it. I would add needed values to the Construction Status domain.

This will keep the lifecycle status field in the network index. Adding values to it will probably end up moving it out of line.