<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question about B_Subnetwork* tables in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359552#M3171</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm adding a few new types to an electrical UN, using the model in the Electric Utility Network Foundation as a starting point.&amp;nbsp; I want them to participate in connectivity traces, but I'd like to exclude them from upstream and downstream traces; although they'll be connected to features that are part of subnetworks, I don't need them to participate in the subnetwork.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought if I excluded these new types from the B_Subnetwork* tables, this would result in what I wanted.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately running the Update Subnetwork tool on test data raised an error when it hit these new types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on some testing, I think I can achieve what I want by adding these types to the B_Subnetwork* tables and using a network attribute or network category to exclude them from upstream/downstream traces, but I'd prefer to exclude them from my subnetworks entirely.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to have these assets connected to my regular assets, having them participate in connectivity traces, while excluding them from the subnetworks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MobiusSnake</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-12T08:14:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about B_Subnetwork* tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359552#M3171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm adding a few new types to an electrical UN, using the model in the Electric Utility Network Foundation as a starting point.&amp;nbsp; I want them to participate in connectivity traces, but I'd like to exclude them from upstream and downstream traces; although they'll be connected to features that are part of subnetworks, I don't need them to participate in the subnetwork.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought if I excluded these new types from the B_Subnetwork* tables, this would result in what I wanted.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately running the Update Subnetwork tool on test data raised an error when it hit these new types.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on some testing, I think I can achieve what I want by adding these types to the B_Subnetwork* tables and using a network attribute or network category to exclude them from upstream/downstream traces, but I'd prefer to exclude them from my subnetworks entirely.&amp;nbsp; Is there a way to have these assets connected to my regular assets, having them participate in connectivity traces, while excluding them from the subnetworks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 08:14:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359552#M3171</guid>
      <dc:creator>MobiusSnake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-12T08:14:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about B_Subnetwork* tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359601#M3172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You could set them as barriers in the subnetwork trace and then select Do Not Include barriers.&amp;nbsp; But they will stop the trace, so if they are inline, they will stop the subnetwork from traversing through the item.&amp;nbsp; Also, if they have a terminal configuration, they will be returned regardless of include barriers.&amp;nbsp; I really do not think there is a way to achieve what you are looking for.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:51:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359601#M3172</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-12T11:51:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about B_Subnetwork* tables</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359764#M3173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you really need subnetworks?&amp;nbsp; Of course, without subnetworks you would lose the ability to run a subnetwork, upstream and downstream traces and many other features and characteristics of subnetworked features. However, these could be replicated by other means if you really wanted to.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Guess it depends on how much work you wanted to do and/or the business value tradeoff. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 16:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/question-about-b-subnetwork-tables/m-p/1359764#M3173</guid>
      <dc:creator>BillBott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-12T16:42:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

