https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222763#M2144 <P>It could, but I am pretty sure in the most recent model, we made all switch have terminals.&nbsp;&nbsp;</P> Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:11:26 GMT MikeMillerGIS 2022-10-18T12:11:26Z https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222158#M2131 <P>I am trying to figure out if a switch associated to a single junction can have it's Open/Closed connectivity pass through that junction.&nbsp;<BR /><BR />In the past (due to a VERY niche issue with a small local utility), we had a line end at the end of each line segment. In scenarios like this, where we had two coindicant line ends, we offset them by a Z value and associated the switches to each line end. In that way, because there was a physical break between the lines (I assume), the switch's functionality passed through to the network and the separate subnetworks were able to build.&nbsp;</P><P>I'm wondering if we can reduce the complexity a bit by taking a single junction that meets both lines, associating a switch to it, and having the function hold so that the subnetworks do not bleed into each other? I have tried doing this in Pro a few times but it doesn't appear to be working. Coming here for a sanity check and/or advice on how to tweak the set up so it works.&nbsp;</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Any advice is appreciated!</P> Fri, 14 Oct 2022 17:46:52 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222158#M2131 MaxCushner 2022-10-14T17:46:52Z https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222274#M2132 <P>The simplest is to move the switch to the end of each line and remove the line end.&nbsp; If you try to associate the two line ends to one terminal, you are bypassing the switch.&nbsp; The lines ends would need to be associated with different terminals for the switch to break the current.</P> Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:39:52 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222274#M2132 MikeMillerGIS 2022-10-15T10:39:52Z https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222508#M2135 <P>Mike, if we were to replace the Disconnect Switch with Load Break switches, could that work? I've noticed when setting Association Rules that Load Breaks require you to specify an SS:S1 or SS:S2 terminal, but Disconnects are Single Terminal only.&nbsp;</P> Mon, 17 Oct 2022 14:56:56 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222508#M2135 MaxCushner 2022-10-17T14:56:56Z https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222763#M2144 <P>It could, but I am pretty sure in the most recent model, we made all switch have terminals.&nbsp;&nbsp;</P> Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:11:26 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/associating-a-switch-to-a-junction-to-block/m-p/1222763#M2144 MikeMillerGIS 2022-10-18T12:11:26Z