<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Coincident Lines - No Error in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1210764#M2037</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I appreciate your response Jens. Perhaps so, but I would expect an offset if parallel. No worry of a loop condition here with a radial network? Not tested that yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>G_Dillenger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-08T14:37:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Coincident Lines - No Error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1208664#M2020</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created duplicate line data by accident. The utility network did not pick it up. I thought the topology engine would know when coincident line data is here, similar to stacked points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="G_Dillenger_0-1662039577071.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50118iAEB19461DADCDBB0/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="G_Dillenger_0-1662039577071.png" alt="G_Dillenger_0-1662039577071.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="G_Dillenger_1-1662039852058.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50119i91A1BCA0A86B5154/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="G_Dillenger_1-1662039852058.png" alt="G_Dillenger_1-1662039852058.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recreated the example in the sample data above. Both features have the same terminals and subnetwork name.&amp;nbsp;Pro 2.9.4, UN V5, FGDB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found this odd since this was a problem we had in the geometric network. I'm hoping I'm doing something wrong. Is this expected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1208664#M2020</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_Dillenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T13:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Coincident Lines - No Error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1209611#M2022</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What you report as an error could very well be a real-world scenario - parallel connections (overhead lines / cables) between two point in the network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You'll likely have to do your own analysis to find line features with duplicate geometries.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 06:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1209611#M2022</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jens_Dalsgaard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-05T06:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Coincident Lines - No Error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1210764#M2037</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I appreciate your response Jens. Perhaps so, but I would expect an offset if parallel. No worry of a loop condition here with a radial network? Not tested that yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 14:37:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1210764#M2037</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_Dillenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T14:37:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Coincident Lines - No Error</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1211537#M2045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I done more testing around coincident lines. What I found is that at the real world scenario you mentioned actually does not work in the utility network, as the subnetwork stops where coincident lines occurs. I was hoping that the utility network was going to help me finding these situations and mark it as an error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="G_Dillenger_0-1662984301481.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/50915iD5585256C433F9B9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="G_Dillenger_0-1662984301481.png" alt="G_Dillenger_0-1662984301481.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Highlight green is my subnetwork. I spread the lines apart for visualization, but the result is the same when coincident. My previous example had it at an place where it was supposed to stop.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A warning during subnetwork building would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2022 12:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/coincident-lines-no-error/m-p/1211537#M2045</guid>
      <dc:creator>G_Dillenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-12T12:11:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

