<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1159943#M1677</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have the same thing - separate Cathodic Tier Group.&amp;nbsp; We actually have two different tiers within that tier group so we can model the electrical connectivity from the rectifiers and also model like UPDM suggests with cathodic test points as the sources (even though they aren't really sources on the cathodic network in real life).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JakeJacobsAVA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-31T16:28:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152129#M1613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to model the Cathodic Protection system of a gas network with ArcGIS Utility Network. The gas network is already modeled with ArcGIS Utility Network. What should be a better practice? To create a new, separate utility network and add the cathodic protection domain network to it, or to add the cathodic protection domain network to the existing gas utility network?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Testing the first approach a new structure network has been created with the suffix "_1" to the feature class names. Is it possible to rename those feature classes without corrupting the integrity of schema?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152129#M1613</guid>
      <dc:creator>konstantinos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-09T13:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152888#M1618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We model the CP network as a subnetwork in the Gas Domain.&amp;nbsp; As we need the metal gas pipes be part of the CP network.&amp;nbsp; If you model it separately, you will have to duplicate these features to build out a CP subnetwork.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:35:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152888#M1618</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-11T11:35:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152927#M1621</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Mike,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for the prompt answer. Since the CP network behaves like an electric network, having it as a subnetwork of the gas domain, network functionality on CP such as tracing won't be affected?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152927#M1621</guid>
      <dc:creator>konstantinos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-11T14:40:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152941#M1622</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have the CP modeled in a separate tier group, so the two commodities can be modeled separately.&amp;nbsp; We use a network attributes and categories to ensure gas does not flow on a electric line.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1152941#M1622</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeMillerGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-11T15:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modeling Cathodic Protection in a Gas Utility Network</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1159943#M1677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have the same thing - separate Cathodic Tier Group.&amp;nbsp; We actually have two different tiers within that tier group so we can model the electrical connectivity from the rectifiers and also model like UPDM suggests with cathodic test points as the sources (even though they aren't really sources on the cathodic network in real life).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 16:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/modeling-cathodic-protection-in-a-gas-utility/m-p/1159943#M1677</guid>
      <dc:creator>JakeJacobsAVA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-31T16:28:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

