<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures in ArcGIS Utility Network Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1067561#M1216</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All - I have been tracing in a single-use Utility Network (Pro 2.8, 3.1 Sewer Asset Package applied to a fgdb).&amp;nbsp; I had applied condition barriers to our 'double-outlet, no inlet&lt;EM&gt;'&lt;/EM&gt; sewer structures and it blocked unwanted tracing through those particular loops (example circled in green in the attached graphic).&amp;nbsp; However, I just discovered that in my UN this doesn't work for 'double-outlet, &lt;EM&gt;single inlet'&lt;/EM&gt; structures (highlighted in yellow).&amp;nbsp; Tracing upstream and downstream of these loops (outside the loops) is fine.&amp;nbsp; But, if the trace is started anywhere &lt;EM&gt;within&lt;/EM&gt; the loop that trace will continue throughout the loop &lt;EM&gt;against&lt;/EM&gt; the digitized direction of the lines.&amp;nbsp; The network in the attached example graphic consists of one Treatment Plant device, Sewer Stormwater Vaults, &amp;amp; Sewer Gravity Mains (plus one Condition Barrier).&amp;nbsp; The red lines indicate unwanted trace results from an upstream trace that was started within the the loop.&amp;nbsp; This is a significant problem for us because we have some very long dual interceptor lines that braid and combine downstream, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would really appreciate any help, just getting started with the UN.&amp;nbsp; Hoping to learn and eventually get this is running in our Enterprise environment.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Nick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-14T11:49:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1067561#M1216</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello All - I have been tracing in a single-use Utility Network (Pro 2.8, 3.1 Sewer Asset Package applied to a fgdb).&amp;nbsp; I had applied condition barriers to our 'double-outlet, no inlet&lt;EM&gt;'&lt;/EM&gt; sewer structures and it blocked unwanted tracing through those particular loops (example circled in green in the attached graphic).&amp;nbsp; However, I just discovered that in my UN this doesn't work for 'double-outlet, &lt;EM&gt;single inlet'&lt;/EM&gt; structures (highlighted in yellow).&amp;nbsp; Tracing upstream and downstream of these loops (outside the loops) is fine.&amp;nbsp; But, if the trace is started anywhere &lt;EM&gt;within&lt;/EM&gt; the loop that trace will continue throughout the loop &lt;EM&gt;against&lt;/EM&gt; the digitized direction of the lines.&amp;nbsp; The network in the attached example graphic consists of one Treatment Plant device, Sewer Stormwater Vaults, &amp;amp; Sewer Gravity Mains (plus one Condition Barrier).&amp;nbsp; The red lines indicate unwanted trace results from an upstream trace that was started within the the loop.&amp;nbsp; This is a significant problem for us because we have some very long dual interceptor lines that braid and combine downstream, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would really appreciate any help, just getting started with the UN.&amp;nbsp; Hoping to learn and eventually get this is running in our Enterprise environment.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Nick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1067561#M1216</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-14T11:49:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1069081#M1221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Man, its tough when everyone replies at once.&amp;nbsp; I did find a Note regarding this on the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/utility-network/utility-network-trace-types.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Utility Network trace types page&lt;/A&gt;:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NickHarvey_0-1623872961089.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/16133i63BE3F34E8565B6D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NickHarvey_0-1623872961089.png" alt="NickHarvey_0-1623872961089.png" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;NickHarvey_0-1623872961089.png&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone on the ESRI UN Team suggest a workaround? Or will directional loops be supported in the future?&amp;nbsp; Our braided (dual) interceptor lines cover dozens of river miles.&amp;nbsp; If we were storm water, this would be troublesome because tracing upstream of an illicit discharge sampling hit on one side of the loop would select the whole loop (upstream and downstream).&amp;nbsp; But the same goes for our wastewater allocation queries&amp;nbsp; (with a potential connection to one side of a dual interceptor).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:16:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1069081#M1221</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-16T20:16:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1069363#M1222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Nick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A workaround is to create a directional terminal configuration with 1 upstream (Inlet) and 2 downstream (Outlet 1, Outlet 2). You will also want to create a separate manhole asset type (ex. Multiple Outlet Manhole) to assign the new terminal configuration, as you don't want to have to set terminals each time on a standard manhole. Assign the incoming main to the Inlet terminal, and the 2 outgoing mains to Outlet 1 and Outlet 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need further assistance with this process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2021 14:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1069363#M1222</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexKabak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-17T14:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1070626#M1232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just got this working thanks Alex. I had seen &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/utility-network-sewer-tracing-elevated-manhole/m-p/1024168#M1729" target="_self"&gt;this post regarding double-outlet manholes&lt;/A&gt; (We use the term 'double-outlet', as 'elevated' might invoke raised manholes at our agency).&amp;nbsp; I had thought it might be a solution but couldn't figure out how to create terminal configs, post-Topology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So that brings me to this question: &amp;nbsp; I could not find a way to implement this solution without creating a new fgdb UN which are not auto-associated with the asset package data model (a number of steps to replace). Will terminal configs always be necessary to create, pre-Topology? Or, is there workflow that I'm missing or unaware of?&amp;nbsp; Knowing the answer will help me plan for our UN Enterprise deployment, your solution works in either event.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a bunch!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Nick&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:56:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1070626#M1232</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-21T18:56:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1070684#M1233</link>
      <description>&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;Just discovered &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/water-utilities-questions/sewer-utility-network-redundant-feature-classes-getting-created/m-p/1007492#M1717" target="_self"&gt;this post&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Using the UN Package Tools it looks like you can Apply Asset Package to a &lt;EM&gt;newly&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;EM&gt;created&lt;/EM&gt; UN inside a &lt;EM&gt;newly created&lt;/EM&gt; fgdb and the schema/model is applied and will still allow you to create a new terminal configuration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1070684#M1233</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-21T20:10:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1072681#M1237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/124811"&gt;@NickHarvey&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I'm glad that Alex was able to provide you with the solution.&amp;nbsp; This also highlighted an oversight in the documentation that should have been updated with the ArcGIS Pro 2.8 release.&amp;nbsp; We've made the change for the next release.&amp;nbsp; While &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/utility-network/utility-network-trace-types.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_3885D93DD6D540B38454BD6F8D041E70" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;the note&lt;/A&gt; still holds true when tracing through loops without directional devices, the updated note should read:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"When loops are encountered during an upstream or downstream trace, trace results will return all features in a loop unless devices with a directional terminal configuration are present."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:02:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1072681#M1237</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonDeRose</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-25T17:02:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trace results with loops and double-outlet sewer structures</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1072690#M1238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Jon makes sense - and concise.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2021 17:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-utility-network-questions/trace-results-with-loops-and-double-outlet-sewer/m-p/1072690#M1238</guid>
      <dc:creator>NickHarvey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-25T17:14:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

