<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment in ArcGIS Survey123 Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775718#M4915</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Doug,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. This would work fine, but the only problem is if say a field guy goes out to a job site where a brand new Backflow is being installed, or a hydrant, etc.. they collect a point in Collector and they'd either have to manually input an ID as a placeholder, or leave it null. As a result, it would be a lot harder to discern which hydrant the survey form was filled out for, unless we had an auto-populating ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our existing workflow is this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CollectorFC sitting in a versioned environment based on a Field_Edits version&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inspection table sitting in an EGDB with a relationship based on facilityID. Our ID scheme is something like wFH and then a sequential number. I can set up a python script that calculates new ID's, but this won't happen in real time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The hosted FS gets downloaded into a staging GDB (not on SDE) and a script gets ran to add new records to the inspection table. I just see this being a problem if the crew puts in the wrong sequential ID, or if the sequence breaks. I thought basing the related table on a GUID would make this easier to manage, but perhaps not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-02-28T14:51:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775716#M4913</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Background Info: Moving hydrant inspection relationship from FacilityID to FacilityID (hyd feature class to hyd inspection tbl) to anew GLOBALID to Rel_GUID relationship.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After doing some searching, it appears that in order for Survey123 to support an auto-generated ID (i.e. GUIDS) the feature service the survey is being published from cannot be versioned, in order to have applyeditswithGlobalIDs set to True.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This means I would have to unregister as versioned the following:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hydrants, Hydrant Inspection table, Manholes, Manhole inspection table, meter assemblies/meter inspection tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or, I could copy the data on SDE, unregister it, and maintain copies of datasets (want to avoid this if I can). Having the surveys as hosted feature services would present its own problems because then I'd have to manage two different related tables with different relationships.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bottom line is we want our field guys to have an&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;autopopulating&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;ID whenever they create a new feature, and have the relate based on that. This may be possible with an arcade expression, I am not sure. Any help is appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775716#M4913</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-26T20:50:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775717#M4914</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you already have points for these assets then you could have the existing FC in Collector.&amp;nbsp; Launch the 123 form from the popup and pass the asset id over to 123.&amp;nbsp; Then have a relationship class between them.&amp;nbsp; I prefer to not use globalid since you can't edit them, they can not be recreated like a pattern can, and it all breaks on export or a database move.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See my post here for more&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/thread/221263-mapping-with-survey123-within-a-polygon-or-admin-unit"&gt;https://community.esri.com/thread/221263-mapping-with-survey123-within-a-polygon-or-admin-unit&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775717#M4914</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougBrowning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T14:51:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775718#M4915</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Doug,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. This would work fine, but the only problem is if say a field guy goes out to a job site where a brand new Backflow is being installed, or a hydrant, etc.. they collect a point in Collector and they'd either have to manually input an ID as a placeholder, or leave it null. As a result, it would be a lot harder to discern which hydrant the survey form was filled out for, unless we had an auto-populating ID.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our existing workflow is this:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CollectorFC sitting in a versioned environment based on a Field_Edits version&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Inspection table sitting in an EGDB with a relationship based on facilityID. Our ID scheme is something like wFH and then a sequential number. I can set up a python script that calculates new ID's, but this won't happen in real time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The hosted FS gets downloaded into a staging GDB (not on SDE) and a script gets ran to add new records to the inspection table. I just see this being a problem if the crew puts in the wrong sequential ID, or if the sequence breaks. I thought basing the related table on a GUID would make this easier to manage, but perhaps not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775718#M4915</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-28T14:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775719#M4916</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best we could do is have a crew number as part of the ID.&amp;nbsp; We have a 5 digit number with the first 2 as the crew number and the next 3 as the code the crew can increment.&amp;nbsp; Does not have to be sequential across the DB just unique.&amp;nbsp; If we have 10 crews all offline then sequential is impossible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:10:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/775719#M4916</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougBrowning</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-28T15:10:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Syncing Survey123 data to a versioned environment</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/1555143#M59925</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is versioned data still not supported in 2024 in Survey123?&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129401"&gt;@KoryKramer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; I am doing the very same thing. Hydrants and related inspection table. I wanted to have just one version for all data collection for a QC.&amp;nbsp; Versioning..well, I don't advise anyone to use more than one version with SDE.&amp;nbsp; It risks data loss. But with just one version parent to child, Differences pane seemed like a helpful QC. Plus although Archiving is not supported on children (nor comparing child to child, hence I advise using only one version) - because I was going to check in data weekly from the child, I figured the Archiving of that on Default would be good enough.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lack of support for versioned data on Survey123 is a curve ball.&amp;nbsp; Surprising it's not supported. There have been threads on here for close to a&amp;nbsp;decade&amp;nbsp;on this particular issue. Data collection is where GIS data begins. I know the focus has been 3d and now AI but field data collection is very profitable: it requires Enterprise licenses and Named Users.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 16:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/syncing-survey123-data-to-a-versioned-environment/m-p/1555143#M59925</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin_MacLeod</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-04T16:59:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

