<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can calculationMode be used to break dependency logic? in ArcGIS Survey123 Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208933#M44616</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. Have an alternative method and agree that this type of logic/flow is not something that should be incorporated into the design if possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 22:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChristopherCounsell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-01T22:59:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can calculationMode be used to break dependency logic?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208561#M44590</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the calculationMode parameter is set to Manual, is it possible to use it to break the dependency logic loop between two calculations referencing each other?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 05:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208561#M44590</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristopherCounsell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T05:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can calculationMode be used to break dependency logic?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208573#M44592</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No. A calculation can't refer to a field that refers to the calculation, manual mode or no. There are good reasons for that, and I can't see them ever changing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are often ways to get around a dependency loop. If you let un know what you are trying to do and why, we may be able to achieve the same result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 06:46:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208573#M44592</guid>
      <dc:creator>LaurenceTait</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T06:46:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can calculationMode be used to break dependency logic?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208933#M44616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. Have an alternative method and agree that this type of logic/flow is not something that should be incorporated into the design if possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 22:59:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-calculationmode-be-used-to-break-dependency/m-p/1208933#M44616</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristopherCounsell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T22:59:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

