<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Can I replace radio buttons with checkboxes Survey123? in ArcGIS Survey123 Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-i-replace-radio-buttons-with-checkboxes/m-p/768133#M3016</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alex,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has nothing to do with repeats. The checkboxes vs. radio buttons actually come from using select_one or select_multiple questions; select_multiples (as in the upper question in your screenshot) use checkboxes, while select_ones (as in the second question) use radio buttons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want that second question to use checkboxes, you could make it a select_multiple, but that does mean people will be able to choose multiple answers. You could limit the constraint so that people can't submit when they select more than one answer, using a formula like count-selected(${multiple}) = 1 in the constraint column, but they'd still be able to select more than one on the interface, which could be confusing for people.&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 01:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ClaireProctor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-27T01:47:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can I replace radio buttons with checkboxes Survey123?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-i-replace-radio-buttons-with-checkboxes/m-p/768132#M3015</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to have checkboxes instead of radio buttons for the "begin repeat", is that possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/423042_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 23:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-i-replace-radio-buttons-with-checkboxes/m-p/768132#M3015</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-26T23:06:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can I replace radio buttons with checkboxes Survey123?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-i-replace-radio-buttons-with-checkboxes/m-p/768133#M3016</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Alex,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has nothing to do with repeats. The checkboxes vs. radio buttons actually come from using select_one or select_multiple questions; select_multiples (as in the upper question in your screenshot) use checkboxes, while select_ones (as in the second question) use radio buttons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want that second question to use checkboxes, you could make it a select_multiple, but that does mean people will be able to choose multiple answers. You could limit the constraint so that people can't submit when they select more than one answer, using a formula like count-selected(${multiple}) = 1 in the constraint column, but they'd still be able to select more than one on the interface, which could be confusing for people.&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 01:47:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/can-i-replace-radio-buttons-with-checkboxes/m-p/768133#M3016</guid>
      <dc:creator>ClaireProctor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-27T01:47:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

