<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Survey123 vs AppStudio in ArcGIS Survey123 Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/survey123-vs-appstudio/m-p/828467#M17751</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have used both of these interfaces when collecting simple geographic info, with photo attachments&amp;nbsp;using &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/android os/tg-p"&gt;#android os&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/iPhone/tg-p"&gt;#iPhone&lt;/A&gt; devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have found some shortcomings&amp;nbsp;when using the app. Specifically, when not in a data coverage area the uploads of the photos fail and the app does not cache the photos in the&amp;nbsp;background by default. Whereas the &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/Survey123/tg-p"&gt;#Survey123&lt;/A&gt; seems to do this just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the apps can be configured and customized, but my organization has very little in terms of resources to do this, so I was wondering if I am missing something simple or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to be able to capture locations with photos and notes. If I have to go the route of gaining the rest of my team access to &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/survey123 existing features/tg-p"&gt;#survey123 existing features&lt;/A&gt; (which would cost me more money, I believe???), then I will do this instead of fixing the app.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward M. Smathers of Dig The Falls&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EdwardSmathers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-08T17:03:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Survey123 vs AppStudio</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/survey123-vs-appstudio/m-p/828467#M17751</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have used both of these interfaces when collecting simple geographic info, with photo attachments&amp;nbsp;using &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/android os/tg-p"&gt;#android os&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/iPhone/tg-p"&gt;#iPhone&lt;/A&gt; devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have found some shortcomings&amp;nbsp;when using the app. Specifically, when not in a data coverage area the uploads of the photos fail and the app does not cache the photos in the&amp;nbsp;background by default. Whereas the &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/Survey123/tg-p"&gt;#Survey123&lt;/A&gt; seems to do this just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand the apps can be configured and customized, but my organization has very little in terms of resources to do this, so I was wondering if I am missing something simple or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to be able to capture locations with photos and notes. If I have to go the route of gaining the rest of my team access to &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/tag/survey123 existing features/tg-p"&gt;#survey123 existing features&lt;/A&gt; (which would cost me more money, I believe???), then I will do this instead of fixing the app.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edward M. Smathers of Dig The Falls&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/survey123-vs-appstudio/m-p/828467#M17751</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardSmathers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T17:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Survey123 vs AppStudio</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/survey123-vs-appstudio/m-p/828468#M17752</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Edward,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When referring to AppStudio, are you meaning an app built on the&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Quick Report&lt;/EM&gt; template? &amp;nbsp;It does have the ability to save submissions while disconnected; at the end of the collection, press 'Save' and they will go into the 'Drafts' folder for submission later.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There isn't any cost differential between Survey123 and an AppStudio template - if the data &amp;amp; form are shared publicly, anyone can submit data without being required to log in; if the form or features are private, then a login (named user) is required to submit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 17:56:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-questions/survey123-vs-appstudio/m-p/828468#M17752</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesTedrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T17:56:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

