<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow custom map scale as optional parameter for geoshape and geotrace questions in report for Survey123 in ArcGIS Survey123 Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/allow-custom-map-scale-as-optional-parameter-for/idi-p/940922</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea is to have the same possibilty as for geopoint to add a custom scale when printing the map in the report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Current situation:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scale is automatically based on the extent of the feature. This is to make sure that the entire feature is displayed in the map. It is impossible to set a custom scale as for geopoints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Issue:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For any extent smaller than few km², which happens most of the time I assume, the scale will be too large to give any information about the location and the surroundings. As a result the map becomes rather unuseful (apart from giving a shape of the feature).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The image below shows an example of geoshape export. From this image, our client cannot have any clue of where this feature is located within the 3'000 km² of the area of study: we lose the spatial information and the science of where.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" height="141" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/476770_pastedImage_1.png" width="128" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggestions:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Let the user set the scale as an optionnal parameter, but somehow add a warning that the entire feature might not be comprised in the map if the scale is to large. It is therefore to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;the user to take the responsability to set a custom scale or let it by default&lt;/SPAN&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Calculate automatically the scale in the report as max("feature extent scale", user-defined scale)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Add an option to map the centroid of the shape instead of the shape itself (not necessarily the best option, neither the easiest to implement I guess)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/message/898688-re-scale-in-mapsettings-for-feature-report-not-working-with-geoshape?commentID=898688&amp;amp;et=watches.email.thread#comment-898688"&gt;Link &lt;/A&gt;to the initial thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though it was probably thought to avoid any unfortunate behavior, I do believe that "preventing" by "restricting" is not the good way here. Let the user the choice to take the risk ! Not much to lose in this case...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 21:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>leo_SwissGIS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-21T21:17:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow custom map scale as optional parameter for geoshape and geotrace questions in report for Survey123</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/allow-custom-map-scale-as-optional-parameter-for/idi-p/940922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea is to have the same possibilty as for geopoint to add a custom scale when printing the map in the report.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Current situation:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The scale is automatically based on the extent of the feature. This is to make sure that the entire feature is displayed in the map. It is impossible to set a custom scale as for geopoints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Issue:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For any extent smaller than few km², which happens most of the time I assume, the scale will be too large to give any information about the location and the surroundings. As a result the map becomes rather unuseful (apart from giving a shape of the feature).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Example:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The image below shows an example of geoshape export. From this image, our client cannot have any clue of where this feature is located within the 3'000 km² of the area of study: we lose the spatial information and the science of where.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" height="141" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/476770_pastedImage_1.png" width="128" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Suggestions:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Let the user set the scale as an optionnal parameter, but somehow add a warning that the entire feature might not be comprised in the map if the scale is to large. It is therefore to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;the user to take the responsability to set a custom scale or let it by default&lt;/SPAN&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Calculate automatically the scale in the report as max("feature extent scale", user-defined scale)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Add an option to map the centroid of the shape instead of the shape itself (not necessarily the best option, neither the easiest to implement I guess)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/message/898688-re-scale-in-mapsettings-for-feature-report-not-working-with-geoshape?commentID=898688&amp;amp;et=watches.email.thread#comment-898688"&gt;Link &lt;/A&gt;to the initial thread.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though it was probably thought to avoid any unfortunate behavior, I do believe that "preventing" by "restricting" is not the good way here. Let the user the choice to take the risk ! Not much to lose in this case...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 21:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/allow-custom-map-scale-as-optional-parameter-for/idi-p/940922</guid>
      <dc:creator>leo_SwissGIS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-21T21:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow custom map scale as optional parameter for geoshape and geotrace questions in report for Survey123</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/allow-custom-map-scale-as-optional-parameter-for/idc-p/940923#M686</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great Idea!&amp;nbsp; There are a few scenarios where I would want to tweak/expand the extend of my GeoShape.&amp;nbsp; Also, as the OP notes&amp;nbsp; - it would be nice to add a second overview map that shows at a larger scale to give you an overall idea of where the location is.&amp;nbsp; Some of our survey geoshapes are very small and you don't get a great handle on where they are.&amp;nbsp; A locus map would be a huge benefit.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The suggestion of showing the centroid of the geoshape at a larger scale is a great one!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/allow-custom-map-scale-as-optional-parameter-for/idc-p/940923#M686</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew-Bowne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-02-27T13:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

