<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Survey 1-2-3 Logical Validation in ArcGIS Survey123 Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/survey-1-2-3-logical-validation/idi-p/927481</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The synopsis:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Business would like to have survey 1-2-3 do a 'validation' of the survey content while in the field rather than having to post process and depending on certain values then have to go back to gather supplemental information.&amp;nbsp; Benefit is the field worker can do supplemental data collection and/or comments while still in the field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A spatial focus area with assets is either compliant or non-compliant.&amp;nbsp; Survey 1-2-3 is great for collecting these business rules in place.&amp;nbsp; Is the asset x, how tall is it, does it have a plate etc, (condition of assets, meeting regulatory requirements etc.).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea:&amp;nbsp; That survey 1-2-3 can take various surveyed entered values. e.g. IF '[specifc value]' is selected in a combo box, and 'THIS' Is checked and 'THIS' text box has a value greater than 10 THEN a comment box with a question must be filled out (required) before survey can be entered.&amp;nbsp; This removes the post process 'in compliance or not' and if not, why. - and would require going back to visit the site.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelRobb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-28T15:42:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Survey 1-2-3 Logical Validation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/survey-1-2-3-logical-validation/idi-p/927481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The synopsis:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Business would like to have survey 1-2-3 do a 'validation' of the survey content while in the field rather than having to post process and depending on certain values then have to go back to gather supplemental information.&amp;nbsp; Benefit is the field worker can do supplemental data collection and/or comments while still in the field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A spatial focus area with assets is either compliant or non-compliant.&amp;nbsp; Survey 1-2-3 is great for collecting these business rules in place.&amp;nbsp; Is the asset x, how tall is it, does it have a plate etc, (condition of assets, meeting regulatory requirements etc.).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The idea:&amp;nbsp; That survey 1-2-3 can take various surveyed entered values. e.g. IF '[specifc value]' is selected in a combo box, and 'THIS' Is checked and 'THIS' text box has a value greater than 10 THEN a comment box with a question must be filled out (required) before survey can be entered.&amp;nbsp; This removes the post process 'in compliance or not' and if not, why. - and would require going back to visit the site.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:42:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-survey123-ideas/survey-1-2-3-logical-validation/idi-p/927481</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelRobb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T15:42:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

