<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Gridding unevenly sampled categorical data in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gridding-unevenly-sampled-categorical-data/m-p/682186#M9944</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was a long-time participant on ESRI-L and ArcView-L but, this is my first post to the new forums.&amp;nbsp; I hope I have posted this query in the most appropriate forum.&amp;nbsp; If there is a better choice, please let me know.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am looking for a method for gridding categorical data.&amp;nbsp; I have extracted from nautical charts and field sheets a collection of points specifying the nature of the surface of the bottom of the ocean.&amp;nbsp; These data are categorical rather than numerical and they are not regularly nor even randomly sampled.&amp;nbsp; Nautical charts are created to aid in navigation and anchoring;&amp;nbsp; they are not created to map habitat.&amp;nbsp; As such, more soundings are made close to shore where relatively shallow depths can pose a hazard to navigation and where ships to tend to anchor.&amp;nbsp; Further from shore,&amp;nbsp; where the depths are more than adequate for navigation and anchoring is impractical, soundings are made much less frequently.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone else tried to create gridded substrate maps from nautical charts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I looked at Theissen (Vornoi) polygons but the concentration of soundings along shores leads to a fine 'honeycomb' along the shore, large polygons offshore and in between long pie-shaped polygons stretching way offshore.&amp;nbsp; Gridding using nearest neighbour yields pretty much the same result.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need a way to limit the influence of the shallow, near shore points -- a way to limit those long pie-shaped polygons.&amp;nbsp; In deeper waters I do not expect that the nature of the bottom will be a continuation of the near shore bottom.&amp;nbsp; I have been thinking along two lines -- both using depth.&amp;nbsp; One is weighting the choice of the 'nearest' neighbour using the difference in depth between a grid cell and neighbouring points.&amp;nbsp; Another is de-selecting neighbouring points which are more than some specified tolerance different in depth.&amp;nbsp; Or, perhaps rather than a pre-specified tolerance, I could bin depth ranges and then limit the choice of neighbouring points to those in the same depth range or bin.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any thoughts on how to implement either of these two options? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can any one suggest other lines to follow?&amp;nbsp; (One could, perhaps, use terrain analysis.&amp;nbsp; For example, slopes steeper than the angle of repose could not be sediments.&amp;nbsp; I am looking for something simpler and, at any rate, I do not have data at sufficient spatial resolution.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doug Hrynyk&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DougHrynyk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-12T21:35:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Gridding unevenly sampled categorical data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gridding-unevenly-sampled-categorical-data/m-p/682186#M9944</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was a long-time participant on ESRI-L and ArcView-L but, this is my first post to the new forums.&amp;nbsp; I hope I have posted this query in the most appropriate forum.&amp;nbsp; If there is a better choice, please let me know.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am looking for a method for gridding categorical data.&amp;nbsp; I have extracted from nautical charts and field sheets a collection of points specifying the nature of the surface of the bottom of the ocean.&amp;nbsp; These data are categorical rather than numerical and they are not regularly nor even randomly sampled.&amp;nbsp; Nautical charts are created to aid in navigation and anchoring;&amp;nbsp; they are not created to map habitat.&amp;nbsp; As such, more soundings are made close to shore where relatively shallow depths can pose a hazard to navigation and where ships to tend to anchor.&amp;nbsp; Further from shore,&amp;nbsp; where the depths are more than adequate for navigation and anchoring is impractical, soundings are made much less frequently.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Has anyone else tried to create gridded substrate maps from nautical charts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I looked at Theissen (Vornoi) polygons but the concentration of soundings along shores leads to a fine 'honeycomb' along the shore, large polygons offshore and in between long pie-shaped polygons stretching way offshore.&amp;nbsp; Gridding using nearest neighbour yields pretty much the same result.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need a way to limit the influence of the shallow, near shore points -- a way to limit those long pie-shaped polygons.&amp;nbsp; In deeper waters I do not expect that the nature of the bottom will be a continuation of the near shore bottom.&amp;nbsp; I have been thinking along two lines -- both using depth.&amp;nbsp; One is weighting the choice of the 'nearest' neighbour using the difference in depth between a grid cell and neighbouring points.&amp;nbsp; Another is de-selecting neighbouring points which are more than some specified tolerance different in depth.&amp;nbsp; Or, perhaps rather than a pre-specified tolerance, I could bin depth ranges and then limit the choice of neighbouring points to those in the same depth range or bin.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any thoughts on how to implement either of these two options? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can any one suggest other lines to follow?&amp;nbsp; (One could, perhaps, use terrain analysis.&amp;nbsp; For example, slopes steeper than the angle of repose could not be sediments.&amp;nbsp; I am looking for something simpler and, at any rate, I do not have data at sufficient spatial resolution.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doug Hrynyk&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gridding-unevenly-sampled-categorical-data/m-p/682186#M9944</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougHrynyk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-12T21:35:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gridding unevenly sampled categorical data</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gridding-unevenly-sampled-categorical-data/m-p/682187#M9945</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm sure Mr Huber will have a better answer, but my first thought would be indicator kriging: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00310000004n000000.htm"&gt;http://help.arcgis.com/en/arcgisdesktop/10.0/help/index.html#//00310000004n000000.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gridding-unevenly-sampled-categorical-data/m-p/682187#M9945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luke_Pinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-20T23:53:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

